Re: [codec] this weeks summary

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 12 May 2010 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75CB3A6BB6 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.106, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RZ6H7bWINwE for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 08:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6346328C19F for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2010 08:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADtk6kurRN+K/2dsb2JhbACeLXGhSJlrhRIEg0A
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,215,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="196550855"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2010 15:20:50 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4CFKn9p029445; Wed, 12 May 2010 15:20:49 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <002e01caefa2$ef88c9a0$ce9a5ce0$@de>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:20:49 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0527FF7A-A0BA-4309-8FF5-A152339F2611@cisco.com>
References: <002e01caefa2$ef88c9a0$ce9a5ce0$@de>
To: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] this weeks summary
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:33:29 -0000

On May 9, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Christian Hoene wrote:

> Raymond did a great job explaining the special requirements of high-density VoIP gateway. They are differ substantially to those of
> soft-phones (but are somewhat similar to VoIP phones with embedded CPUs). The requirements include low memory footprint, ultra-low
> delay,

Uh, can someone walk me through the low delay part? I either missed of failed to understand that 

> low complexity and mostly narrow band. But aren't those requirements already covered by existing codecs? Shall this working
> group provide a codec profile for end-to-gateway beside the profile for an end-to-end codec?


Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html