IETF Logo Mail Archive

[codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-requirements-03

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 26 April 2011 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BA8E076F for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbJlXF3GQweL for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF73E07DA for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=966; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1303856949; x=1305066549; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=VWjpxmLVJyl3auaFx9BPTX8FZz+TxMHzlXHe7gwKdRc=; b=AcyFmVL8/TBZ5mzGCK8LCD/6+ppb3ibWKs5cdnSfdBoKJUnG7sG4TZnu Uznq7Z9nt542h8JZNi/vMTbocWCylGIRigToIjUwnKSXrgKFD1QRaXObl 3Rf6WmC+lFeDDGsX133lUgPs3mPmDtW00Ciuunhd60aABOyWuN74gOuD1 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,270,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="302576590"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2011 22:29:09 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3QMT8CV025139; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:29:08 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:29:08 -0600
Message-Id: <F875CCD7-AC61-4A7B-B95F-C737E93202B1@cisco.com>
To: codec@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Jonathan Rosenberg <jonathan.rosenberg@skype.net>
Subject: [codec] WGLC of draft-ietf-codec-requirements-03
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:29:10 -0000

The chairs believe the bulk of the changes agreed to at the last IETF have been made to draft-ietf-codec-requirements-03, all of which were a consequence of the previous working group last call for this document. Since then, there has been a good deal of list discussion centered on requirements for codec comparison, and the document update on April 13 includes a proposal for such comparison. In order to clearly evaluate consensus on this, we would like to start a second two week WGLC of this draft. Please review the draft and if you believe any changes are needed before this is ready to sent to the IESG, please propose the new text you would like in the draft to the list before May 10 along with the reason you think the text should be changed. 

Also note that this document does NOT cover the actual test plan - that is out of scope. Here, we only consider requirements that.

Jonathan & Cullen <CODEC WG Chairs>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email