Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates?
Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 25 January 2011 01:05 UTC
Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B977D3A6968 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:05:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FauZVBCJqRg2 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD903A69DF for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so5064450iwn.31 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.170.138 with SMTP id f10mr5768588icz.269.1295917676454; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm11471592iba.22.2011.01.24.17.07.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so5064425iwn.31 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:07:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.35.1 with SMTP id n1mr5743812ibd.0.1295917674165; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.167.132 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:07:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <071.a593fc9ae1e42af52489587fc97cf872@tools.ietf.org>
References: <062.89d7aa91c79b145b798b83610e45ce71@tools.ietf.org> <071.a593fc9ae1e42af52489587fc97cf872@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:07:54 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=StDCwAeH-TLn98C=RCkECOGYrMwFAj7ERB92a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: codec@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="002215046b87a0770d049aa1589f"
Cc: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca
Subject: Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:05:01 -0000
I actually do believe that the requirement is already addressed by section 4.1 of the document. I was responding to a comment that only full band is required, which is clearly not what we agreed upon and not what's in the document. _____________ Roman Shpount On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:40 PM, codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>wrote: > #8: Sample rates? > > > Comment(by gmaxwell@…): > > On 11-01-24 07:14 PM, Roman Shpount wrote: > > I would like to see 8 and 16 KHz as required rates for the codec to > insure > > interoperability with existing narrowband and wideband codecs. In other > > words we should be able to negotiate 8 or 16 Khz sample rate if audio > will > > be transcoded for PSTN or wideband codec such as G.722 > > Jean-Marc wrote: > > I believe such requirement for narrowband/wideband is already present, > but > > I don't mind making it even more explicit is necessary. > > > > I believe that we since are close enough to finalizing the draft we should > try to include proposed language with our issues. Otherwise there may be > no clear path forward. > > Some of the requirements specify that compatibility with > wideband/narrowband is important, but for the avoidance of doubt, I'll > suggest: > > At the end of 4.1. Operating space: > > "Because interoperation with existing wideband and narrowband facilities > is essential at least one method of interoperation must be provided > regardless of the codec's operating mode, sample rate, or bitrate." > > Of course, I would be perfectly happy to leave this out entirely (as I > believe the application section 2.1 already implies the requirement) or > use some other language. > > -- > > ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- > Reporter: hoene@… | Owner: jean-marc.valin@… > Type: enhancement | Status: new > Priority: minor | Milestone: > Component: requirements | Version: > Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: > > ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/8#comment:4> > codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/> > > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >
- [codec] #8: Sample rates? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Raymond (Juin-Hwey) Chen
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? Michael Knappe
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Roni Even
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? Brian West
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? Schwarz Albrecht
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? 44.1kHz? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Roman Shpount
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Raymond (Juin-Hwey) Chen
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Pascal Pochol
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Pascal Pochol
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Pascal Pochol
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Butrus Damaskus
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Pascal Pochol
- Re: [codec] requirements #8 (new): Sample rates? Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] #8: Sample rates? codec issue tracker