Re: [codec] 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-codec-requirements-02

>>>
[Christian Hoene] Despite hundreds of emails, what were exchanged on this
mailing list on issues regarding requirements, the editors have been
reluctant to update the requirements document according to the consensus
process on this mailing list.
>>>
Christian - perhaps you could post a list of the issues you see that haven't
been addressed?

Stephen Botzko

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>wrote:

> > The authors believe that the requirements document is complete.
>
> [Christian Hoene] Which authors? So far this document has only two selected
> editors.
>
> >The chairs
> > would like to now issue a 3 week working group last call for
> draft-ietf-codec-
> > requirements-02. At the end of 3 weeks, if no comments have been
> > received, we will pass the document to the IESG for approval.
>
> [Christian Hoene] Despite hundreds of emails, what were exchanged on this
> mailing list on issues regarding requirements, the editors have been
> reluctant to update the requirements document according to the consensus
> process on this mailing list.
>
> If I compare draft-ietf-codec-requirement-02 with
> draft-valin-codec-requirements-02, I only see editorial changes.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-codec-requirements-02&difftyp
> e=--html&submit=Go!&url2=draft-valin-codec-requirements-02
>
> Sorry guys, if I see this I become very cynical on the standardization
> process at the IETF.   The editors have not done their job and the chairs
> do
> not care. At the end, it all looks like rubberstamping with a little bit of
> theater.
>
> Christian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
>