IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] All requirements fulfilled?

"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Thu, 28 July 2011 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAAF21F8B17 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id He6QW9unFLWb for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx06.uni-tuebingen.de (mx06.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BA321F8B10 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoeneT60 (dhcp-134c.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.19.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx06.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p6SHKc6i021878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:20:45 +0200
From: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: 'Gregory Maxwell' <gmaxwell@juniper.net>, codec@ietf.org
References: <005001cc4d39$ef62b580$ce282080$@uni-tuebingen.de> <BCB3F026FAC4C145A4A3330806FEFDA93CE6698219@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <BCB3F026FAC4C145A4A3330806FEFDA93CE6698219@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:20:37 -0400
Organization: Universitat Tubingen
Message-ID: <002801cc4d4a$aff5ec30$0fe1c490$@uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKiEgraXK9t4QgOteHZpVilEu8o6gGWFmIIk0m9fCA=
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus: NOT checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.2.1.23; host: mx06)
Subject: Re: [codec] All requirements fulfilled?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:20:48 -0000

Hi Greg,

> 7 Delay tolerant networking
> 1.      high delays >120ms                                      => needs
to be defined  in payload
> draft

To state it clearly: Due to a variety of reasons, it makes perfectly sense
to support large RTP packets transmitting multiple Opus frames.

My point is that at least the payload specification shall allow large
packets (>120ms). What is the problem with this requirement? In the end,
it's a payload requirement not a codec requirement...

Christian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email