Re: [codec] Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container

Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <markh.sj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F8E12D11C for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sg_j8OfT8JRB for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7834A12B02D for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h19so9096785ywc.0 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to; bh=U9GOaFN3HVuVZDpOL6nCfpBc6sMLDtVgxOktd+bfje4=; b=tq/r24i1XrMAw8uh/nxMqS7C0/Lks5yKr9qtLD0P3Mzl/7pTtN/MHwUMSwH6Bj7jtJ CZn2lrnshvvI1IXcwIjLBXD9wAWgwXWqD2G5Ab3tEtnJBrs3cvqzhw95rxO3NziQUXqr EPkDPcy8am25BJT9jTqcA3HevfagOyFHk2arnN3+TCxziRllG43vvL0vpOri05btGSNr s/v+nOKSQeKv1KMQ04laEQhpdfZ+4lv+ppf2tqib2o9uSSH9NhM6Jm0YOiTGKR/lV0mE S5OY3TQaWkURlffBJGop4XESJH4NIrCNGbrYkCaspozS7yQx0kKgyzOuo9S99vkZ7Js1 YKmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=U9GOaFN3HVuVZDpOL6nCfpBc6sMLDtVgxOktd+bfje4=; b=R/G2awvf8iuxR8oKMgbf7LtdIFAzDoEow6SWk/ObJijxa8rMSBki8O4TSLxA9BxzF0 BHpje+i8dw6E7bsqAzUHe0kI6aXK5Bx11K9XvivDsBkThHO8aLvTUx8bOTKiPtVaO94o GWbv9Ql7n2jWNgKlFyYoFgYowLof3m+iV3BA/TbJEu7PD8XhYpRNRocM47gGfM+6UMky cpLyfY7lFTabklBnjmpKI/hKDL24WeXSJJR+WjhUS1bc+L8b5Mw6cx/ZzX8CH85DRHn5 uPV1lIl1U+rRjP6Dem2E9sMpNs5rSp7Dg2/gCkL89OPskvuOUiDfNXjvO5w1R3H2UZSy 3T+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLDLwwjeOndZuM3n4SuOtQLPgkCghHtrhmFhd75Dix/uMz1rNH3c/Ip+ATC6MBeVyOQmG18CBsu17Bhxg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.145.85 with SMTP id i82mr1239554ywg.87.1464760431579; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: markh.sj@gmail.com
Received: by 10.129.88.133 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcu6-g3PiaofwuUwUgbXeXC1NyfZ-GBy9cqCdz47UZc_Pr-Fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcu6-jN2gC0FRm5Vu6CmT5=yMdJr1WSaJJ_-FOXffw8bWjc_g@mail.gmail.com> <574887A3.30003@xiph.org> <CAMdZqKEer5GxSuOdHwY49=Pe_xy_7OnE-RR3Wgc2+C7=g3La1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160529104233.1bfbda09@telecino> <CABcu6-g3PiaofwuUwUgbXeXC1NyfZ-GBy9cqCdz47UZc_Pr-Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 22:53:51 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vWBEgJmKjhBOsCWpE6OGbFf9EBs
Message-ID: <CAMdZqKFSmJshqVO4nYHVaHdbGHmh2_g=r2eTv7WPptxziTqveA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>
To: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/x9d76EPSMVuPsz5goUykotZtbmg>
Subject: Re: [codec] Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 05:53:54 -0000

>> In section 3.2 perhaps it should be clarified that the first ambisonic
>> channel (W) may be used directly for mono playback, particularly if
>> streams with channel mapping family 2 might only have one channel.
>
> I added a short paragraph to the end of 3.2. What do you think?

Thanks, this looks good in the -02 version.

 - Mark