Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS
Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 16:58 UTC
Return-Path: <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A54E21F8B9D for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jh0tCKW8FHqk for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-mail03.mozilla.org (dm-mail03.mozilla.org [63.245.208.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF92E21F8B86 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.167.211] (unknown [216.1.177.180]) (Authenticated sender: jvalin@mozilla.com) by dm-mail03.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D4D4AEDBE; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E70DDD2.1050508@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:01:06 -0700
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <35921B63-3FBC-411D-B587-4AB81F218E57@cisco.com> <4E66F111.9070008@mozilla.com> <6A58A83F7040374B9FB4EEEDBD835512A3FBAA@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <4E68D175.9090703@mozilla.com> <6A58A83F7040374B9FB4EEEDBD835512A400EE@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <4E6FFD21.4090801@mozilla.com> <01b501cc72c9$e1a23a00$a4e6ae00$@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <01b501cc72c9$e1a23a00$a4e6ae00$@uni-tuebingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:58:37 -0000
On 14/09/11 03:34 AM, Christian Hoene wrote: > It would make sense to use the information available at the decoder and then > simply add an pitch drop and replication function together function at the > decoder output. That can be done easily (even by me). > > Koen and Jean-Marc: With parameters in the Silk/CELT codec provide this > information? See commit 25f7f355 I just checked in that implements a OPUS_GET_PITCH() request that returns the pitch of the latest frame -- if available. Does this address your issue? Jean-Marc
- [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Anisse Taleb
- Re: [codec] Discussion around ITU LS Koen Vos