IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing

Ron <ron@debian.org> Tue, 12 April 2011 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0CCE08CE for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74JHA+8S-tFV for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCC7E0824 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmQHAKCopE120qsf/2dsb2JhbACYV40oeMJ9hW4EhVmICQ
Received: from ppp118-210-171-31.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO audi.shelbyville.oz) ([118.210.171.31]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2011 05:04:10 +0930
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA2D4F8F3 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:04:09 +0930 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at audi.shelbyville.oz
Received: from audi.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (audi.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xUWYakoofEkr for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:04:08 +0930 (CST)
Received: by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1A504F8FE; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:04:08 +0930 (CST)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:04:08 +0930
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: codec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110412193408.GR30415@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <4d9f7107.a7fed80a.542d.ffffa087@mx.google.com> <20110409030611.GG30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <BLU0-SMTP9917A8ABBC14D6FFE833E6D0A90@phx.gbl> <20110410023345.GM30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <BANLkTin1pTWfThu1mF=PnBKMz_0_=5f8rw@mail.gmail.com> <20110410180627.GN30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <4DA2EA85.8010609@soundexpert.info> <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC5E8D@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20110412051947.GP30415@audi.shelbyville.oz> <BANLkTik0=pv9VUO4y=4ADu-pvdj=ekEpOw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik0=pv9VUO4y=4ADu-pvdj=ekEpOw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [codec] A concrete proposal for requirements and testing
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:34:17 -0000

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:16:26AM -0400, Stephen Botzko wrote:
> I don't see how anyone can think we've achieved consensus.  That is just
> plain silly.  BTW, isn't up to *chairs* to call for consensus?

That would have been why I didn't prefix that by "with hat".

Do you actually have some things you would like to dispute about the
queries which Jean-Marc raised?  *I'm* not seeing any.

Should we ask the chairs if they see any, and think we can finalise
that part of the discussion before moving on to the next big one?
What is the correct procedure for this?

If a test is going to be proposed, clarifying what tests have already
been proven to satisfaction, seems like a relevant precursor to that.

 Ron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email