Re: [Codematch-develop] Suggestion of work distribution

Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville <granville@inf.ufrgs.br> Wed, 02 September 2015 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <granville@inf.ufrgs.br>
X-Original-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86071B40C9 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CnQxTpe-6G0G for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delivery2.ufrgs.br (delivery2.ufrgs.br [143.54.2.212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E071B2AB7 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delivery2.ufrgs.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by delivery2.ufrgs.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4E220A1A4 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:11:49 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from msa1.ufrgs.br (msa1.ufrgs.br [143.54.2.208]) by delivery2.ufrgs.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F014300824 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:11:49 -0300 (BRT)
From: Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville <granville@inf.ufrgs.br>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B896F8DE-13EE-403D-B09A-E8A6FBB22F66"
Message-Id: <E9D57CA2-E065-4D72-9B9D-168C537F13E2@inf.ufrgs.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:11:46 -0300
References: <133e01d0df7f$a7be94b0$f73bbe10$@rnp.br>
To: codematch-develop <codematch-develop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <133e01d0df7f$a7be94b0$f73bbe10$@rnp.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codematch-develop/K-yQyCe_EQTHvatJhoO9N_HDdmM>
Subject: Re: [Codematch-develop] Suggestion of work distribution
X-BeenThere: codematch-develop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Discussion forum for the planning, coordination, and development of CodeMatch\"" <codematch-develop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codematch-develop/>
List-Post: <mailto:codematch-develop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:11:56 -0000

Resending... This is an opportunity for additional developers

Best regards,

Lisandro
> Em 25/08/2015, à(s) 18:47, Wanderson Paim <wanderson.jesus@rnp.br> escreveu:
> 
> Hello all,
>  
> In the last meeting we discussed the possibility to split the development efforts of the CodeMatch project. So, based on the ‘Feature Project Plan‘, Matheus and I figured out some candidate features that could be developed in parallel.
>  
> There they go:
>  
> Visitors, Potential Coder, IETFers, Consumers of Code, etc.
> 1 - Will be able to view CodeRequests (and matches) by protocol or working group/IETF area
> 2 - Working group views of CodeRequests and Coders (matches) will be available.
> Reputation Scoring of Code
> 3 - Will be limited to features of the code repository used by the coder (ex. Github shows how active a project is, how many followers and forks have been created)
> Incentives/Awards
> 4 - Way to show top coders - by volume of projects at first
>  
>  
> The two first features refers basically to a filter for CodeRequests (and Matches). There are some sort options in the current prototype front-end, but it is not functional yet.
>  
> The third, related to the reputation of a project (based in the amount of forks in GitHub, for example), lacks a bit of clarity. Maybe we can discuss better in the next meeting.
>  
> The last feature might be easy to develop.  It is about creating a ranking of coders based in the amount of Projects/CodeMatches associated to them.
>  
> See you tomorrow.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Wanderson
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Codematch-develop mailing list
> Codematch-develop@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop