[Codematch-develop] Implementations linked to drafts

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE96D1B2AEE for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gkN4VY3iuDj6 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53F61B2AEB for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by layy10 with SMTP id y10so105469182lay.0 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gT21p69ugMFRum67RV9iBuTkJZIk9ou035+YadzmMnU=; b=ynuPUmkTshKJ+6ozqh2PTqCMYLv6dJms+iEsVADPTYKr3bf99VjxrTVvBNbfwHKSug oc+69ZRiTbKsdQp/JtvJpB0qmFpPfm340ZLmsVARESNsgOpYiwesrrIUAA9UvZOSPPX2 aUn6Up4bfSj/rPURo5StPToR0v82wTl1GDYYkVNIv/XrD1IW2okiTgChLzfylE4qrMEA /9vjErv7jx1gxK1U0ncEGkYm45EK7xc4WDxYpW1Zq/iCC5cQNxZexzNH6Xx+AjulVIGv OjjWo99f0P98zSoYDuEtrYXmBIhsIBENvC8FCmJDdgGccEhDANeOTkbZYYX8De/+R+gj 9JAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.29.36 with SMTP id g4mr10292682lbh.56.1431392535057; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.11.199 with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 21:02:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH65prnRycLnw2sO29=pv+MBDXvWX18rEao=PXoe74VpwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "codematch-develop@ietf.org" <codematch-develop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133f994961a5d0515d80bdb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codematch-develop/Y1MwvdrjbbN5DPMO1Vf_n9nP_qc>
Subject: [Codematch-develop] Implementations linked to drafts
X-BeenThere: codematch-develop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Discussion forum for the planning, coordination, and development of CodeMatch\"" <codematch-develop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codematch-develop/>
List-Post: <mailto:codematch-develop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 01:02:19 -0000

Hello!

I was at the IESG meetings last week and you will all be glad to know that
CodeMatch came up as something several of the ADs "need yesterday".
Specifically, there is a lot of interest to see the connections of
implementations with drafts directly in the data tracker so that they can
be pulled into shepherd reports and possibly the implementation sections of
drafts.  This is the work that Christian has been doing and is a top
priority.

I'm hoping that there has been some progress on playing with the existing
data tracker templates to add this functionality and that we could discuss
it on Wednesday's call.

I'd also like to see if we can take next steps to create templates for
CodeMatch that alter the interface slightly (as discussed to keep the
appearance of a separate,but related site) and begin to develop the site
according to the prototype.

Thank you!

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen