[Codematch-develop] Feedback from IESG call

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 June 2016 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9703812B063 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJWauvUTR0dQ for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A86CF12B01C for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id j2so109606554vkg.2 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M7r4Kog8Or/jiWrx8niiQIzKmKaxvLkXUtb30fHHo1Y=; b=qC0s5iEpo8JLWTF5GCODSDHZ2kCXEfWOWCwoVM4TOgNYu47fQvVIviKBVU+F5PKElS jxOD64fvlJX/FqRN2tal2Vf3FNAl+aSqNkS8IB1l6hV+fh4CC7eTtTNZ6KGklFs4VLpj nSod1BFNzv4XrGiktLPuQGvx/JdcX8ukjpw+8zbXogqU72++kB+2HGbrvsJX1ye8OXk2 ZHehsBt5pma6Ea9JWzVQm2ICO9afTLFGQyqCYPwCVK3sQslf3a1X+IiEaXTGZGkeNuvd Lr7Z+7V7f5By0wzRk2p4LU8Cs5ZIg8Z6WRQwCeu7WXG4KDpbqgXPaBJwffzN9mhAFBxF h3BQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M7r4Kog8Or/jiWrx8niiQIzKmKaxvLkXUtb30fHHo1Y=; b=gTg1Wd3DI0c/YfQSr3AmRkCUPG4xQ9vb+sNBjNpvaevXfGcNzV5wCbOPqGTse5Ts0r 2I45hVy/PhWVmQ0GPe3wOPXVdCtlAY4Cjb4YVM9gZwgYETtQ3oBDvyTo3rYqOv5qa4Rl HzhhewoIuirVqL3yhWgQC918Bj0s0nnMIvbbJKdC9WejWTsrCU7Ak++wDqU8arELmlXB 6fAmk1bCvSkUcO+QpRoo2R1qi52cvijdEnM8l7Kv9RZnL7qrjZl2Desy1j/JQHFPzyR3 pgstjTqqwqrX/sNOliq/269IrY1apTvo5z+zOb2eCoUfIaYAulEl41ilD1NFUlW/NL1o PtyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJRXaZXmVMCZBiZBeChGZa984K/VqhxZ8UBTzvHqDhp0r+j0yDJucyCJ2SHjj4qLBsa27ins/vK65F8nQ==
X-Received: by 10.159.54.162 with SMTP id p31mr16008797uap.113.1466693520755; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.36.236 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:52:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH7UQ_mt8iUbWY5-VXMRwc8P7DhE2D7=d=hZmEz_Kjepaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "codematch-develop@ietf.org" <codematch-develop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codematch-develop/jB47BC2p8QVDQgWCufcjYg5MO-0>
Subject: [Codematch-develop] Feedback from IESG call
X-BeenThere: codematch-develop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Discussion forum for the planning, coordination, and development of CodeMatch\"" <codematch-develop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codematch-develop/>
List-Post: <mailto:codematch-develop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:52:03 -0000

Hello,

Thank you Wanderson for another good demo presentation!

Here is the feedback I captured from today's call, we'll need to sync
up and figure out how best to address the concerns.  Then we should go
back to Ben, Robert, and Stephen to get feedback on our plan to
address the concerns.

Rough notes on suggestions for estimates
- feedback from development community once it is in use
- way to assess if someone's estimates are good over time
- way to include confidence in estimate
- include coding ability in estimate

- include warning that estimates may not be correct
- include confidence rating for estimate
- scoring system for accuracy of estimates
- text field for other ways to estimate level of effort
- advise coders to do their own estimates as well when in doubt and/or
reach out to the mentor for confirmation
- understanding of the protocol and how well written the draft is
effects estimate
- Levels of estimates - wander son's idea


Archive button use not intuitive
- Close this request option

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen