IETF Logo Mail Archive

[codesprints] ACTION NEEDED (was Re: Virtualized Codesprint(s))

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB4E3A0F2C for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.274, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJAh5iSanpKc for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6533A0E8D for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02DKdUXr079675 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:39:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1584131975; bh=sG2skJsUrlJrsaDLRQDIX3EXSnr+Hv/MBSzKn5uuqpo=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Sty15adjEfpl0ZMMZbIQl+nB/2jd6aKNMMb1lYFSA6Paqd1MXWsod4U13HLyQIvS1 eh9uv60owYo8dmV+F+4/oaAoVxRF850i2X+oz5vEC0gEMores2blAg2yE5NKcHmuGJ JVamxXnuFXfFv3HzuSqlub58Hh/A1q7DQOEj2cNQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: codesprints@ietf.org, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, Ryan Cross <rcross@amsl.com>, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <821c3637-9ed1-713a-60cc-7e577924106b@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <42a4516c-1a38-ae4d-1bea-3131c935a363@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:39:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <821c3637-9ed1-713a-60cc-7e577924106b@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/fseZ5r4ZSzhzJwH56lDyaUylTWE>
Subject: [codesprints] ACTION NEEDED (was Re: Virtualized Codesprint(s))
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 20:39:51 -0000

If you've already responded to the Doodle below, thank you!

If you haven't, and were signed up for the sprint at IETF107, please 
fill it out asap, even if it's to say "I won't be there".

RjS

On 3/11/20 1:31 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> All -
>
> We need to adjust the codesprint to the cancellation of in-person IETF 
> 107 activities.
>
> We think that having multiple, shorter virtual sprints spread out over 
> a few weeks on different days/times of day will work better for most 
> participants than one long one.
>
> With that as a plan, I'd like to see if there's a good time on the 
> originally planned Saturday for a 2 hour virtual sprint.
>
> Please fill in this doodle: https://doodle.com/poll/xc7ekff3ubbsude5
>
> I'll send subsequent messages to get a feel for how make it easy for 
> folks to participate in future virtual sprints.
>
> RjS
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email