IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [coman] Device Classes?

Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Sat, 05 April 2014 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D959B1A00E4 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 00:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGqm09n0yvFS for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 00:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22a.google.com (mail-pb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DDE1A0013 for <coman@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 00:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rr13so4465330pbb.1 for <coman@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 00:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=YB6G0DWJtZC0raSx3rgfuNW6/zcU4+HuJYup8/zpBm4=; b=bTHcqueLmt9ZTo0w3J4BAYMQLwCyplBtBnNhO5jVWo+wGW1sTMSAuH5ey+SQCPRIEe WO6Sm8sauiYKhy4qwI0mVmKp6VHvQwxlim3As9hcTH3/pZun6TuJeDHZulXGr2ia0iP8 J5ICHbVfBtzz+mJ1DP5Ugb4qF262Jat7W1UPra2DkqvXYUWqp4dznV0MRdXP8JO1VBwl jOu0K6QJgkCMv+X3GVzz2TJd6kdR1tUG9I5DRqm7Ad4DufoemLiELu3SPpNwu46NIj/G yOp4lobXSQzHiYLlxDo27G6ETxXuGrzv7iT8vZBRiSQ3nx8FQqm8SZGY+0ZEzThcIQhE +kbg==
X-Received: by 10.66.122.101 with SMTP id lr5mr392967pab.130.1396681204979; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 00:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.66.154.130 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 23:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140405060707.GA84694@elstar.local>
References: <533BBFB7.2000100@gmx.net> <893C4FAC-437D-4140-9832-A9ABA2D1518A@tzi.org> <533E75A9.5080003@gmx.net> <8D653B3C-E678-4A66-9798-978950977694@tzi.org> <533E9864.4060806@gmx.net> <EBDEF2B4-32C3-4B41-9CAF-C1A836CC6D7B@tzi.org> <533E9B6B.1080602@gmx.net> <B443FF47-FCF4-4FD7-96C9-07686D75D690@tzi.org> <CABCOCHQRki5grLuTeQX3QRCnUxe14M0UueKN8=eFdO9K-rWLeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA8Jza1QkAdxEE0g0_igc4Lh066Ten=e1w-rxa9iadfbaw@mail.gmail.com> <20140405060707.GA84694@elstar.local>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 23:59:44 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: JklbyEw3TOnoNofVzSKVa-17CDM
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA_2Voy9c45UK=p7LuG=BH48=TOOT_Vb62bHom0SQ_=joA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Qin Wang <wangqin@ies.ustb.edu.cn>, Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, Xavi Vilajosana <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e0ddf165d9d04f6462f3a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coman/AQlDFmGXABGdeS9UAlV4oYqT8FM
Subject: Re: [coman] Device Classes?
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman/>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 07:00:14 -0000

Juergen,
The goal of this -00 is to kick things off and spark interest beyond
6TiSCH, especially in COMAN. Glad to see this worked and that you agree
with the general direction.
One of 6TiSCH's milestones for August 2014 is to ask for help from "YANG
people". Could I ask you to provide feedback to the authors or the 6TiSCH
ML? The 6top authors are holding a ad-hoc webex discussion on Tuesday [1],
maybe a good first venue for feedback.
Please note that [2] was written specifically because there is
no constrained version of RESTCONF. It doesn't claim to be that, and, if
there were such a thing, we'd be more than happy to consider it.
Thomas

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/current/msg02114.html


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:01:16PM -0700, Thomas Watteyne wrote:
> >
> > At 6TiSCH, we have started this work, with YANG based data model [1] and
> a
> > CoAP-based protocol built around that [2], any URI starting with "/6t" is
> > to monitoring and manage the 6top sublayer. I believe there would be a
> huge
> > benefit to having a more general solution, to which we all agree, i.e. a
> > CoAPified version of RESTCONF. COMAN looks like the right place to do
> this.
> >
>
> Well, what you have in [1] is not really YANG and surely not RESTCONF
> either. I think [1] essentially illustrates that having no agreement
> (or standard) how to do NM in this space is a problem. Don't get me
> wrong, I appreciate the direction of this work but claiming it is a
> YANG based data model I think is not quite right.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email