IETF Logo Mail Archive

[coman] Is Coman maillist still needed? WAS:FW: coman post from mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com requires approval

"Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF144129A84 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:37:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pa-1U2UWivqu for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B77B5129A56 for <coman@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:37:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k184so269885504wme.1 for <coman@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:37:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language :disposition-notification-to; bh=IRpXAzblsInfC2X6RfdcdYm7hHF7oDdvf0r/+sveAWo=; b=JoUAc62L16y4KjTjtZkzPHzlCyY6jyunj6+En8gnkQHnmOwEJ9HKW+WkeMSKWXKKlf j/IchtXPK3d/RwLfd5GbbblhrxUJsZyQBwJkfBkzBfIYF/yOpTMi7kIke61DZh9n35nW 78drmM/cugQEDwB1SFB4/1aw4SVLlg/u7b5ZWE4MmbtwXQd42pkPXLpeJJhhMBB7+bn4 LL6u8UVNg3vNH7iInrrvQsQTiIV3KoLbvpMTm/sH6VfJNRcihngqeybclsZzn8eLfDgc +A9ON487kt9DSXDKmFOyB7EK6Hx6uNKBU+NNw6FxFUSACylb8SQPmZEkcvzf/Bgzhcpr 78IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language :disposition-notification-to; bh=IRpXAzblsInfC2X6RfdcdYm7hHF7oDdvf0r/+sveAWo=; b=PZRtgAe9LGZW3jGFo1+XuLnmtqH3gkMRPeP0Furssl9c/vHa9SMz7SdYC3TD13xmYH QQKqzX4yCFYxlCtJb5kRrIpiC26iwC+mntvqdTcXUPq9MpUcQ7yDY8ynRqn9xHtR90Yg bQo4US9N1t50H9oDuscuB/MsfVHgmRdcVyf/RY06AmzhxRO2esf99QrNdTNZev7/1yU7 Fg5cLaRKpiNlLgAh+F99JlKAw9TLBA/0rGDPMRXDExs8jvXnL+Q42bLr253fvVGxFzd6 NAiNS/gJVCs8iNbKFrif9CII+/PwuovO3XHun3GTptlrH1QliKAkGEvKwR4Gpsj134Vr v1Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK+iNsXQLCP5eg1FIhm161+4FrrWqBolLDnffO2ws6Qamd+U96eqo6afXE15cNx6Q==
X-Received: by 10.28.170.134 with SMTP id t128mr56839719wme.29.1483558633026; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOPFLHJVQJ (p5DCC6819.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.204.104.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kq7sm99770833wjb.30.2017.01.04.11.37.12 for <coman@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:37:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
To: coman@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 20:37:06 +0100
Message-ID: <030001d266c1$f17e1920$d47a4b60$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdJmwbYC1PAMkEliSEm8wnc2kylQZQ==
Content-Language: de
X-AVK-Virus-Check: AVA 25.9819;2DC73FAF
X-AVK-Spam-Check: 1; str=0001.0A0C0205.586D4EE8.00A6,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0; AE713
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coman/HRl_w37-62JeFx0TrXJmmHp0sFs>
Subject: [coman] Is Coman maillist still needed? WAS:FW: coman post from mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com requires approval
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/coman/>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:37:17 -0000

Dear All,

Coman maillist has been established some years ago for the discussion of the
so called Coman drafts on the "Management of Networks with Constrained
Devices".
In the meantime the Coman drafts have been published as RFC 7547 and 7548.

Other than some spam mails there is no traffic on the maillist.

We assume the maillist is not needed anymore. 
If there is no request or discussion started within one week the maillist is
proposed to close.
Please let us know otherwise.

Thanks,
Mehmet

-----Original Message-----
From: coman [mailto:mailman-bounces@mail.ietf.org] On Behalf Of
coman-owner@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:35 PM
To: coman-owner@ietf.org
Subject: coman post from mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com requires approval

As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the following
mailing list posting:

    List:    coman@ietf.org
    From:    mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com
    Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
    Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list

At your convenience, visit:

    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/admindb/coman
        
to approve or deny the request.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email