Re: [coman] Is Coman maillist still needed? WAS:FW: coman post from mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com requires approval

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 22 June 2017 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A313F126CC7 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcavFByv4KIW for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A67126C3D for <coman@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1468; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498117686; x=1499327286; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5CMJyPxeULMf1ic4xMwW19vWThFDF8SbSvHga8Qr7ec=; b=CeXH8njGq/pMS2YVeAFw4/8lZpahgG98cVWCkcqc/itecbiOREBEJl7v t9mFBGucMr28iY7vJCME+61Ua+A5KqzdNle6aQN5U0jDdFLZpFkaWa5Ie 3EBxnQlBSXBo6kzCJFLW7PXNv4koGrzoMsY84KeF1py9qSFX21x1IgaGq Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DuAQBVdUtZ/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhDqBDYNsiwyQa5gJIQuFeAKDPRQBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMBASEVNhcECw4DBAEBAwIfBAMCAicfCAEIBgEMBgIBAYooEKtPgiaLZwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQWBC4VigguCeYRNAQGDLoJhAQSFJZk+k2KCCYVIg0uGcysBjCCEE4Q3NiGBCjAhCBsVSYUIOhiBNz42hy2CMAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,372,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="695324282"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jun 2017 07:48:02 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.38] (ams-bclaise-nitro5.cisco.com [10.55.221.38]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5M7m1tR029714; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:48:01 GMT
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, coman@ietf.org
References: <030001d266c1$f17e1920$d47a4b60$@gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <477f9b39-c62a-f5fa-9ecc-c6b28ae91560@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:47:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <030001d266c1$f17e1920$d47a4b60$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/coman/QAF8LG-L807q6dCSyfcZ8RbkiYg>
Subject: Re: [coman] Is Coman maillist still needed? WAS:FW: coman post from mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com requires approval
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/coman/>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:48:09 -0000

Dear all,

I requested the coman mailing list closure.

Regards, B.
> Dear All,
>
> Coman maillist has been established some years ago for the discussion of the
> so called Coman drafts on the "Management of Networks with Constrained
> Devices".
> In the meantime the Coman drafts have been published as RFC 7547 and 7548.
>
> Other than some spam mails there is no traffic on the maillist.
>
> We assume the maillist is not needed anymore.
> If there is no request or discussion started within one week the maillist is
> proposed to close.
> Please let us know otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Mehmet
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: coman [mailto:mailman-bounces@mail.ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> coman-owner@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:35 PM
> To: coman-owner@ietf.org
> Subject: coman post from mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com requires approval
>
> As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the following
> mailing list posting:
>
>      List:    coman@ietf.org
>      From:    mailer-daemon@ietfa.amsl.com
>      Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
>      Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list
>
> At your convenience, visit:
>
>      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/admindb/coman
>          
> to approve or deny the request.
>
> _______________________________________________
> coman mailing list
> coman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman
> .
>