Re: [coman] [6lo] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)

Jürgen, Dan,

in order to come to a quick conclusion about this charter item, can
you both indicate whether my proposed change would be acceptable? (or
propose something better?)

====================
OLD
2. Related MIB modules

NEW
2. Related interfaces for management applications (e.g., MIB modules)
====================

That would immediately cover the 6lowpan MIB, but not necessarily
limit the scope to MIB modules.

Best regards
Ulrich

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
<j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:21:51PM +0000, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>
>> So instead of 'development of MIB modules' the charter should maybe say 'Information Model for the counters in the 6LoWPAN layer for basic monitoring and troubleshooting using SMIv2 MIB modules format'?
>>
>
> You can argue for this but I believe this is not useful. We have ~20
> years of MIB modules and frankly most of them (and in particular those
> getting implemented) are focusing on statistics and counters. You can
> now go into the direction of saying we stop doing this concrete down
> to earth data modeling work and instead we do information models (in a
> yet to be agree format). Is this going to help implementors? Is this
> going to help people deploying stuff?
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> _______________________________________________
> coman mailing list
> coman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman