IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [coman] [6lo] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Fri, 27 September 2013 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86E311E8101; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9vunAEZwdZO; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1CA21F96E4; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.154.212.78] (128-107-239-234.cisco.com [128.107.239.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r8RHicc2014866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:44:40 -0700
Message-ID: <5245C405.1070808@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:44:37 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <20130923180202.32168.94377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128E75E5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <52419692.7050903@cisco.com> <20130924134921.GA19673@elstar.local> <52419C92.9040807@cisco.com> <20130926132817.GB25326@elstar.local> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128E9913@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <20130926215221.GA26059@elstar.local> <CAK=bVC-TJ1+4O+gLHTEnNqd83fuEBgMC1gN_u_xeEHN9Oi5Vig@mail.gmail.com> <20130926221814.GE26059@elstar.local> <9DD59AEB-EF1B-47B2-B81C-00E38F1534F3@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9DD59AEB-EF1B-47B2-B81C-00E38F1534F3@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: coman@ietf.org, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, 6lo WG <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [coman] [6lo] WG Review: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes (6lo)
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:44:50 -0000

On 9/26/13 11:58 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:

> OLD:
>> 2. Related MIB modules
>
> Hmm:
>> 2. Related interfaces for management applications (e.g., MIB modules)
>
> NEW:
>> 2. Related MIB modules (including, where applicable, management data models using other established IETF management data modeling schemes).

Carsten,

*If* the WG and the IESG want the broader scope, then I'd suggest 
explicitly mentioning Yang models instead of the "other established ..." 
wording. A key question would be whether such models would cover config 
and operational data.

A more radical approach would be to (gasp!), only do Yang even for 
operational data. It is easy to map Yang to a RESTful API (see 
draft-bierman-netconf-yang-api) which might fit nicely with CoAP.
But not doing SMIv2 models might be too radical?

    Erik

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email