[conex] Comments on draft-ietf-conex-mobile-03

Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com> Tue, 22 July 2014 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <nanditad@google.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1591B28ED for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.38
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3YfAtepqsp7l for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B5E1B2929 for <conex@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x69so4464026oia.20 for <conex@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/6U3F4+XdQElGYnTbPhqMlajWrFUJqddEoH4hi41sC8=; b=kZWU2FAA6Rz1RlJOMoeHYxLhSq7cYywz5Yl01BXNV9xt9DiYQsKc1WqVbRyUIasiiN 4v4yZcJfaFR2fpjmQNd/yRFKrDFlbcS8+6nZM8+tIaCQYlo1Kyfyof/GA61QcR8rfI59 izHvWzdjef9dLZkUTrOGt8RByMSd6Hne1QY5S0fVDlo66ZBOT5vVeFKciBQzyv6qNt2+ mcKSbectaMFZMRNfv7A7xiaZPuqkb377VbYPrbA8eiw9Zk+79vJOrAnT85yjQfRdH3u4 Z+5nmwl8cI/Z++HyCGDn/vjbs2Ls/2Ow8uJIdfSQTm4wlbgh15p8CAeHIymUfFuoWqfk QeAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=/6U3F4+XdQElGYnTbPhqMlajWrFUJqddEoH4hi41sC8=; b=d60JpjdlcS/grpT7tfEu9DEpq0lK3TD+MNG3B74d85MsQPejR8xyqCsgVNYr0jAUlp pHltaVdqM4cgkoe7+Mxz45OGQ6aEKj5aF9FVNjEEM/HCVvWQHwtpqoZvSGpbEoela1v0 ar+69wjaR+Tabg/hz1mVdDQKkYlNPqLV7PX6prQSEDX7BYIR6N2UEshj+CswqavVbPQU sgZPNchq6dV14UcQG4TTEJTgAHbxc84A1e16WF0iSUC/QHh5GAECxmAi32eqD8KB2vd3 QgOAZ+pUP7M4H0ENMh8qi7s7RZHMWLoyJK6Ta7KOnBQIWYMQmuy5X8j5TR8zSeUHLrz9 nHkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnvtH0EPEK+NFdCmuOJzSQVxQAzM7k1Zjay9Q59e7M0QqABaN0QN4O8/PINbEl2VMoA1zlt
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id ux1mr48004805obc.57.1406039316001; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:28:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAB_+Fg5SZtVEec30Qu-sYwvHQzcQ-_YV2MA1_np5=4EWgELK5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
To: Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>, Faisal-Ghias Mir <Faisal-Ghias.Mir@neclab.eu>, Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, Ying Zhang <ying.zhang@ericsson.com>, cjbc@it.uc3m.es
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/conex/1X73ucTg8embT6eYHSCkq2XqS8U
Cc: "conex@ietf.org" <conex@ietf.org>
Subject: [conex] Comments on draft-ietf-conex-mobile-03
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:28:42 -0000

(as individual contributor).

Still reading, but wanted to pass on comments on early part of the draft.


* The second para describing measurements in cellular networks: is
there a reference to the data?

Section 2.1 ConEx as a basis for Traffic Management

* The second para goes into great details on QoS requirements in EPS,
radio bearers etc... but you lost me: what is the point you want to

* On reading further into Section 2.1, I am just not getting the high
order point you want to make here. The text switches back and forth
between explaining the current state in mobile networks (DPI etc.),
and that ConEx can be useful.

Instead, I suggest the following: separate out the two. First clearly
explain the traffic management problem in cellular networks. Then go
on with the specifics on how ConEx can be used to address the problems
laid out.

I think the above split will save the readers a lot of time in trying
to parse through Sec. 2.1

Further, the usefulness of ConEx is referred to in very high level
terms with little details. Going a step further and specifying some
level of detail as to how ConEx might exactly work in mobile will be