[conex] conex-destopt-02 section 7: IPsec and tunneling / byte-counting
Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Fri, 30 March 2012 07:30 UTC
Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE17821F8757 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CeeJCqNH4Zfx for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A0821F8754 for <conex@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so223738wib.13 for <conex@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jw4mA2PMcpIi1nlDkIi7Yk1ySO284HGpq4hEFpA1MkY=; b=UTXeeSqAWiYh2Cd1xY5EqFCoCafNaLZ/invzWDMCvO+yBhfrZ+1RrA8E/1LnK7APlH vjalvBi+wY9rMM2EmhKn9Eux/bIU4fqFBLwB/gJEGYnfc7VLCl/gsq/Ipc5udZUujzWw /670R5ODnIq/dt8AqI2fhvqzWD3iGCjBfJx/Ia9ryviX0wg95ghQFKlZM5a/tbKdcFB2 vBhGDeFiXT2gzqqBcsBiKfIC7IxZMOwhL4rmlXmxcLilW0H46fdR8yo/OTlulow//eSQ kzl+S3Oes7IFrKnHiD9fekIml9TjyGC6GD1Dty6JICfaNSTgsdzpESO/ReyaS4PgJZnp vmew==
Received: by 10.180.95.74 with SMTP id di10mr7187440wib.1.1333092643402; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-1333.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1333.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm4230905wib.2.2012.03.30.00.30.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:30:41 +0200
Message-Id: <69F41DCF-573C-4A1F-BCE7-5877E5025B0E@inf-net.nl>
To: conex@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLTHrCcX1+C5+ywnfyH0usfw5lTShxbiCOALV2LI9VA53RE4cnL1RIVIPi+stBkBTCLDr3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [conex] conex-destopt-02 section 7: IPsec and tunneling / byte-counting
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:30:47 -0000
In draft-ietf-conex-destopt-02 there is some wording on IPsec and tunnels. I think this applies to all tunnel methods. I suggest to put the byte-counting stuff in another document. It is more complex as written down here, as for example the IPsec function is often decoupled with the Conex function, probably another box. Teco