Re: [conex] TCP mods: Intro

Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com> Tue, 28 October 2014 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <nanditad@google.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8197C1A9076 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHtwTd2BoQJO for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF8C1A8F4C for <conex@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m8so849591obr.24 for <conex@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UFQuXz5ZybI9TQttny3g68jFNT+1doXKHyvla/adri0=; b=Gw56g/uPZMAoVMb+WcDB653uolD6iAHU2JGItW7CuM3mE5fdPOyQeVdffZmYCTUgcr 43YSs13wyBnG5TnWgXrno7QN+txjU44xv5zROnzPuBgw1fkeieecyw/FQ6ElfJZ4DEiT ce28C7wuB0Imp9KiCq6OuNdhfg7NhDC9IiyswvAwZ/oJpkdPWtdUu7UhhfLgIugZFwmS k/ZMAH+otgQHGHAlUhaMQCQzATphm/gQ1JvZaft3LKuHntc3J02OzqcVOzl/PVdkDw+O ojbwiVD2x92E65cOvra+zc2fjX/GJK98L/mCZj1ZJacG4CaS9gzKq9dr4mRNiA67Hc17 zKfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UFQuXz5ZybI9TQttny3g68jFNT+1doXKHyvla/adri0=; b=hSlZNVAvPDCi6F313InsL/I2cc0GwonWjZJYdZq8OIAA0j8xtPnAqDRXh3J4DQzPdO mp9rP46dUoyh/F/PXI4aJXMvIKyO+iu9G6itCPrBuyLjovnBmXD5BxXBZogriGO+1f6o e1x0J6XviK2W2L3NkEnHEO/h2PLoetd47MutcrvFJgoyFu8pb2zBcWS5K5+PHy/NfGB9 kxazl43xYD1zTdQBboFitSlpT1C9uvWAyzczgopYlsvVeE56dbJ5Zj5K8kxJ2pQQqZ0X eeYFYE86jW1+6E/xadigs4j1Wi4R5jP0PSWXlr/uc0XFhpu61c95/3uGI62tHqHTLDGa 8Ppg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXMqXruYRvIHiWXpXb7YSTvjTmPUWAXf+JbAWyxRuQFw6wnA6BWnWccGSmspYMI5z23c1l
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.148.232 with SMTP id tv8mr1946775oeb.72.1414514434989; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.248.161 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <544F6C46.2060705@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <54253A22.2050904@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <CAB_+Fg7qxpy+41RhvTxHvNiR3kXAxJgo0oSFPHfBi6bu0197KQ@mail.gmail.com> <F5A33008-0D14-4930-A3A2-FF11851EBDBB@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <CAB_+Fg5srg94gpUnUj2v2o07Y4oimakMb-ubOtSguAP+u=6+zA@mail.gmail.com> <544F6C46.2060705@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:40:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAB_+Fg5jSEwFtGjAks0BAd3HGUOkCK8=jLu8bCR0quxbeyyezA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b1635076d7c2e05067e4ece
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/conex/6v3DS6vgCIQzFqfwp0FhkIv2soI
Cc: ConEx IETF list <conex@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [conex] TCP mods: Intro
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:47:28 -0000

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <
mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:

> Hi Nandita,
>
> I've added one more sentence:
>
> "Section 5 finally discusses timeliness of the ConEx feedback signal as
> congestion is a temporary state."
>
you can remove 'finally'.


>
> Section 6 is acknowledgements...
>
> Mirja
>
>
>
> On 27.10.2014 19:23, Nandita Dukkipati wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> Would it be helpful if I add a paragraph saying:
>>>
>>> „Section 2 provides an overview of the needed modifications for TCP
>>> senders to implement ConEx.
>>> First congestion information have to be extracted from loss or ECN
>>> feedback in TCP
>>> as described in Section 3. Section 4 details how to set the CDO marking
>>> based on the accounted
>>> congestion information.“
>>>
>>>
>> The above para is much clearer than before. Thanks. Please also include a
>> sentence or two on the remaining Sections 5 and 6.
>>
>> Nandita
>>
>>
> --
> ------------------------------------------
> Dipl.-Ing. Mirja Kühlewind
> Communication Systems Group
> Institute TIK, ETH Zürich
> Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
>
> Room ETZ G93
> phone: +41 44 63 26932
> email: mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch
> ------------------------------------------
>