[conex] Comments on WGLC draft-ietf-conex-destopt-08

Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com> Tue, 25 November 2014 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <nanditad@google.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722E21A6F57 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yptzWchmnfWO for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A15421A700A for <conex@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f51so7798364qge.4 for <conex@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AA5jv9IA2B9DSU71ZdHeMe1aUToGnaXA/QgXxMl4qc4=; b=k1DQ+pJs2qduwd8KemZ0vxLnL0qSdTKjcCrvbSswh/lFYb+3maUAusja33/mcbUynf LwSh+yWiMNYwvNElT3sKzFgUGJucmDHngJdui/oCW32WF+Ai6/3eoDDg6lkR0MIZ3v/s kU+bve/ND0Tba/qkD7kf7GFEFSW26temqTZptCbbjOCOrs2Ij7UY7ba9y1bRePXXwMtk sLWc2jPyxLhIDt/Y5eHtYRmfipe2uQgxemDzykDkPwLBqV7heA0hlTuyp8HsvLDphvqj gP8JPTACuzhKeErBHXOY2itg6xrvuH0pL0aplmegYHsd673fr083e6pAuFog6lIRUL8t fWJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=AA5jv9IA2B9DSU71ZdHeMe1aUToGnaXA/QgXxMl4qc4=; b=VMzIDF5yvfnTG+u8oLmymC71BGUzH9w7Adsq3Kw55kjDUCpN+d675k65Nsm/d81WdR 756Sx2c4hJLe9aVqO9vi2sxwfkHB69hgce16UPtmTGj4Mub2Q7M4nKRZ2ivWKWVrfvYW rdtPRAtwpoN2P8C+hwX18iLTSFJZBOsx4n9OSuKwLXI0bx8kCaqVZS2yQVAFtIcq5Lmq VLUarzodUlwRG8+8bw+hUa+oC7lIBBHXTGNHFq02AVA9kQyx9qM/0IWbEDElmwhMs9V/ Nb+HvAsqr4LNLD0FFpQ9/XlZCRXb4cS1wZJ4dtgrEkUPCCjhHemmgqC9cgwiKb1BzwAG 6pcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk60CjgX15Gha4qIm7LsnN0tYFtv1l4tw5cYStU3w6p3+vZ5APN+1ZEe1QplsxInT3CFJnw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.209.136 with SMTP id gg8mr34533953qcb.16.1416894692870; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.183.201 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:51:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAB_+Fg6KQUUSPWbXXYtJ7KZWbCLYMtyyTv5h9OE86hTjeHgYsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, ralli@tid.es
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/conex/9RgA2tK9KzOIn9P0zfUc4MLA66E
Cc: "conex@ietf.org" <conex@ietf.org>
Subject: [conex] Comments on WGLC draft-ietf-conex-destopt-08
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:51:34 -0000

Nice draft! Especially the section on mitigating flooding attacks by
using preferential dropping. A couple of nits:

*  4.  ConEx Destination Option (CDO)
The CDO has an alignment requirement of (none).
-> The CDO has no alignment requirement.

* 10.  Security Considerations
"The chg bit in the CDO option type."
chg bit?

Thanks!
Nandita