[conex] Comments on draft-kutscher-conex-mobile-03.txt

Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <nanditad@google.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9485821E8036 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.826
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.826 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-rP0vn6K9b8 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED6421E800F for <conex@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so2425069obb.31 for <conex@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=W7Vqze7bVHn7nbn5xp/qGQbS8JeQjl7GeDAV5XBZiwk=; b=HXCeB3VgpkKEZgPhGdzPXHVQaQ3oGq2KSSbVUB44wWzojGPAnKdYyVt5o2Q07vS8ey 47VIGzjf8uAODQyLKNRYxvX4ZMZpwHhNQULCmRIeeWfZLQO3mYjZOFd0O+ur+/oK4vVj OzA/SVRiOmsVmqfDP7WY4XFAwPL8litnYl79+MzBh6xNrb/DZtRno4VrMCn/mV2Rtul5 T6gA+7tHpThVhlsdgjf6dm/lLCjvM33i4jng8mo+nNtrdrhYFhNtZTgEO63ETnB8em7C 59f4MgXwjjGJ7fbyeDltKTvZCpIlVGN52F4tuW3NQVTTKuLRv7e8i2cgKyUVqT0yRCgD OxCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=W7Vqze7bVHn7nbn5xp/qGQbS8JeQjl7GeDAV5XBZiwk=; b=KNdMx6073X25MkDgwhsgvllaeVD9hmLKmhU59fbECg+oftizuB77kcEDQ6qyS1X7tO J7ejwbefiMKH5MJhps3hZKaRIXaLnAcuOSsqvgRc7BXJ2655PMvzvspSPQYRQ7kOSQGq f0eOWgwD6/8Pd5brJ1/OlGZJbwLnGn9uk23lhvazmfINzqciuzjjM+SNGiV7mUB2O9oO nwvExXTUrYCT7EtObiFF/i5w2LUU+1i+mIcGjZdVGL31LW15GFFCKLhf27baQdxDsL+l hVtKZbrsMLgFpRuOG7rq88RIBMQA1JcAiMAkgXj3esGQ9jFR9DcBYJWNhYeu1l6S1gLx CVLg==
Received: by 10.182.183.73 with SMTP id ek9mr31396325obc.15.1332984011303; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.183.73 with SMTP id ek9mr31396313obc.15.1332984011169; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.69.164 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:20:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB_+Fg42OEzLXs8qZFH7OiUW75ofEP97UC1YY9WtNeAxz=q=nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
To: Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04478a317a1f2004bc578609"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiu8LXsh4tTuG+nSoolmrKktZbv7DT1MqIz3w65S4xKqSmmskx3bf98YAtOvSRbF82XAfSMNDbmEB0hD71SkGUHiWuLPSIzn4jC7HW6OqBKcBBlQ/Rcxxil9j5zPugrjFCg95B
Cc: conex@ietf.org
Subject: [conex] Comments on draft-kutscher-conex-mobile-03.txt
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:20:13 -0000

Following are my first parse of comments/questions
on draft-kutscher-conex-mobile-03.txt (as individual contributor). Please
fwd to your co-authors - I do not have their emails right now.

Nandita
-------------

1. First of, this is a nice draft elucidating the use of ConEx in mobile
scenarios. At a high level, my take is that the draft expands upon the use
scenarios presented in ConEx Concepts and Uses, but putting it in the
context of mobile networks.

Mobile networks are an apt example for ConEx usage given their limited
bandwidth and the fact that they already perform some sort of detailed
per-use volume accounting. As you mention, hopefully adding congestion
based accounting can be built upon it.

2. Sec 3.4 ConEx as a Form of Differential QoS
I don't get this para at all. Please consider rewording.

3. A high level question: do you have any data on loss rates (exposed to
TCP) in mobile (cellular) networks?

Is it true that link layer protocols perform aggressive retransmissions to
mask losses from higher layers such as TCP - and if so, what does this
property mean in the context of ConEx. If very little loss is exposed to
higher layers, how will the end systems give ConEx feedback to the network?

A discussion on those lines would be great in this draft.

4. Finally, the draft is filled with many 3GPP acronyms of which I know
very little - but I guess you can't do anything about that :-)