Re: [conex] IPR Disclosure: British Telecommunications plc's statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-04.txt

Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mattmathis@google.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5D321F8BA3 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:35:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-8vPaPfMrFn for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAD121F8BB2 for <conex@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hm9so1168034wib.13 for <conex@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:35:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UsU785wyYtj7DCktnk+wW5z/tGNjTS6ozQfgXIVstNk=; b=JHzBd1VAsvkxhGX0Mid9WHeHZIz6o89KNwW6ZgX6MoMGyWfzfDD6H9t9zIUf0bgYv5 xKH3nBm+JS9p3/PKTZZFWMd+ZaF5xMTgA5S3BQByNvefvlcjd1FNpjf9bFFLVbAuJl2e cFG1TIK5OUmLKeCoDWhD5GWUYPD7AUxIhlyzmjYOBZmsXkQQCCXTqxRnnQd/oy5GnXmw GZeSAItS3Ql04B1X5Swp0i0A47tlsB6j2qqvEPuu75cck/ERSjH36HirwxLkZXDJe/8D 4E0WMNGjRII0ibXDbIbZNZf6rgaIz77jeyKS3fBRMaW4AwJXxpirpPODiqQ49iKUYliv FAGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=UsU785wyYtj7DCktnk+wW5z/tGNjTS6ozQfgXIVstNk=; b=aDLgrvQOa39VyPsam09hImb3dq7IXsYiKw9rGca6z6E4KU9utdvriu0PbDEY5l1Ca1 9v0MNte286MxUbGXxvNWuW/XFQMM360xfkFoUUg7JLjDxsbAhzlcOKAJkcIXu7MsddIk 5G7FwUBUK5KQLGFd+9vIQqSNATiJChGGZkW03nJuRoIioE81Vuchgoz5nTAmTpZ6XTDO 1qXn36KiwqtGxuRmgIUpy4/wcrVwKo+NK1lD0Pf2wXdNzY06SWWHRCz9OBfUjT5khg33 mhaXnEYQen762oBbfiwGvU1hhGoLcYsdmeutjet0rJgYJQvLG978cR4yf+QA40i4DWj/ +IKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.92.71 with SMTP id ck7mr42315wib.20.1354664128935; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.61.20 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:35:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20121204225649.5793.60567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20121204225649.5793.60567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:35:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH56bmCWPfixB667UHD1+BLt9a5nFhXa2Mfr1x2KXA-=_i40-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com>
To: bob.briscoe@bt.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c807031f5e504d00f5223"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkXoqQrLq8hN8dbT7qVVV90/D2vEwP1XNe+X1QsOYRz1BW5TFMps/mkh4vfpoa+foDm0OIyd0pimGNdsFnonxx6mpjq+icwop94IJSWlVLgDX02Zo9esv63WpsdWxevF10iZusfvqeS+Vkw/NDUr46K2PWJGzG7brJAtrgMAOnmhjFS6mnE95kkZygZclpdaFnsvVyu
Cc: conex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [conex] IPR Disclosure: British Telecommunications plc's statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-04.txt
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:35:31 -0000

(-IETF wide and secretariat lists)

Bob, without a licencing statement, this IPR disclosure essentially kills
ConEx.....   Why should anybody in the IETF contribute free consulting to a
technology which BT claims to own, and can at any time in the future charge
what ever it pleases?  Why should anybody in any of the OS communities do
the same?

Random Cisco statements say something like:

The reasonable non-discriminatory terms are:

If this standard is adopted, Cisco will not assert any patents owned or
controlled by Cisco against
any party for making, using, selling, importing or offering for sale a
product that implements the
standard, provided, however that Cisco retains the right to assert its
patents (including the right
to claim past royalties) against any party that asserts a patent it owns or
controls (either
directly or indirectly) against Cisco or any of Cisco's affiliates or
successors in title or against
any products of Cisco or any products of any of Cisco's affiliates either
alone or in combination
with other products; and Cisco retains the right to assert its patents
against any product or
portion thereof that is not necessary for compliance with the standard.


I hope such language is on its way.

When was the patent application first submitted?

Thanks,
--MM--
The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay

Privacy matters!  We know from recent events that people are using our
services to speak in defiance of unjust governments.   We treat privacy and
security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are.


On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:56 PM, IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Dear Matt Mathis, Bob J. Briscoe:
>
>  An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled
"Congestion
> Exposure (ConEx) Concepts and Abstract Mechanism"
(draft-ietf-conex-abstract-
> mech) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on 2012-11-22 and has been
posted on
> the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures"
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1922/). The title of the IPR disclosure
is
> "British Telecommunications plc's statement about IPR claimed in
draft-ietf-
> conex-abstract-mech-04.txt."");
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>