Re: [conex] Comments on draft-kutscher-conex-mobile-03.txt

Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E47C21F8864 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.163
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.163 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.436, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ah3wh-QFTRWC for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hubrelay-rd.bt.com (hubrelay-rd.bt.com [62.239.224.99]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8534421F881D for <conex@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVMHR01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.40) by EVMHR67-UKRD.bt.com (10.187.101.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:49:17 +0100
Received: from rdw02134app71.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.234.138) by EVMHR01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:49:15 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (147.149.100.81) by rdw02134app71.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.6.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:49:15 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1333010964625; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:49:24 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.163.15]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id q2T8nBvn031553; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:49:11 +0100
Message-ID: <201203290849.q2T8nBvn031553@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:49:13 +0100
To: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB_+Fg42OEzLXs8qZFH7OiUW75ofEP97UC1YY9WtNeAxz=q=nw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAB_+Fg42OEzLXs8qZFH7OiUW75ofEP97UC1YY9WtNeAxz=q=nw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
Cc: conex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [conex] Comments on draft-kutscher-conex-mobile-03.txt
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:49:20 -0000

Nandita,

At 02:20 29/03/2012, Nandita Dukkipati wrote:
>4. Finally, the draft is filled with many 3GPP acronyms of which I 
>know very little - but I guess you can't do anything about that :-)

Given the intended audience is 3GPP types, I guess this is fine.

In a previous review, I think I caught all the abbrevs that weren't 
explained. I think they have all been fixed now.



Bob


________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design