Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-03.txt
Toby Moncaster <toby.moncaster@cl.cam.ac.uk> Sat, 31 December 2011 15:34 UTC
Return-Path: <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2384521F8482 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:34:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfZSHZd+WxGk for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0255821F8480 for <conex@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:34:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:55814) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:tm444) id 1Rh0wa-0003yA-qC (Exim 4.72) (return-path <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:34:00 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:tm444) id 1Rh0wa-0001Wd-4x (Exim 4.67) (return-path <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:34:00 +0000
Received: from [128.232.235.161] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.4); 31 Dec 2011 15:34:00 +0000
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:34:00 +0000
From: Toby Moncaster <toby.moncaster@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.4.1112311534001.4403@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <F956135C-A5E0-45A3-8060-10A1AB9E92B5@cdt.org>
References: <4EC4690C.2060707@it.uc3m.es> <9510D26531EF184D9017DF24659BB87F3311080B41@EMV65-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net> <F956135C-A5E0-45A3-8060-10A1AB9E92B5@cdt.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: "T. Moncaster" <tm444@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: conex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-03.txt
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: toby.moncaster@cl.cam.ac.uk
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:34:04 -0000
On Dec 31 2011, Alissa Cooper wrote: >Hi Phil, > >Thanks. I have entered these into the tracker. Just one question below -- > > On Dec 19, 2011, at 2:29 AM, <philip.eardley@bt.com> > <philip.eardley@bt.com> wrote: >> S2.3 para 1, "measures" -> "is" (twice) - think this would be better as >> you're defining what rest-of-path & upstream congestion are >> > >I don't understand what you mean by "this." I think all he is saying is can you change it so it reads more like a definition by using "is" rather than "measures". Then it would read "rest-of-path congestion" (also known as "downstream congestion") is the level of congestion that a traffic flow is expected to experience between the measurement point and its final destination. "Upstream congestion" is the level of congestion experienced up to the measurement point." Toby > >Best, >Alissa > > >> Last para of S3, p10. There's a bit of a jump from the penultimate >> sentence about flat rate pricing to the last sentence about conex. Needs >> some linking >> >> S4, Enabling more efficient capacity provisioning - this para is hard >> to follow, it twists around a bit. Also, change title to Enabling more >> efficient usage of capacity? I think it may be simpler to split into a >> use case which is user-focussed (about scavenger) and another which is >> operator-focussed. >> >> S5 para 2 "strong incentive to tell the network .. data" -> "some >> incentive to deploy conex" >> >> Para 3, Specifies -> proposes (so you don't have to wait for the >> conex-tcp draft) >> >> >> >> Philip Eardley >> Research and Technology Strategy >> >> This email contains BT information, which may be privileged or >> confidential. It's meant only for the individual(s) or entity named >> above. If you're not the intended recipient, note that disclosing, >> copying, distributing or using this information is prohibited. If you've >> received this email in error, please let me know immediately on the >> email address above. Thank you. We monitor our email system, and may >> record your emails. British Telecommunications plc Registered office: 81 >> Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ Registered in England no: 1800000 >> >> -----Original Message----- From: conex-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:conex-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of marcelo bagnulo braun Sent: >> 17 November 2011 01:53 To: 'ConEx IETF list' Subject: [conex] WGLC for >> draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-03.txt >> >> This note issues the WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-03.txt. >> (http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-03.txt) >> >> Please review the document and send comments before the 5th december. >> >> Thanks, marcelo >> _______________________________________________ >> conex mailing list >> conex@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex >> _______________________________________________ >> conex mailing list >> conex@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex >> > > >_______________________________________________ >conex mailing list >conex@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex >
- [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-0… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-us… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-us… philip.eardley
- Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-us… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-us… Toby Moncaster
- Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-us… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [conex] WGLC for draft-ietf-conex-concepts-us… Mirja Kühlewind