IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [conex] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-13

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 04 December 2014 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFED21A1A68; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 05:28:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSJRwmkWipM4; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 05:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE751A1AB1; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 05:28:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37A32CC5D; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:28:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAXNLI27hrGG; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:28:12 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342252CC4D; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:28:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DCB7EE98-AAD5-4F83-9059-22269D3A7646"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <547C8977.40307@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:28:11 +0200
Message-Id: <8E1D276E-F093-4FAD-BB5F-A6D36799ACEF@piuha.net>
References: <53E1377A.5010906@nostrum.com> <547C8977.40307@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/conex/xVXTSYHtKm1bpGHxrRppWRw1kUQ
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech.all@tools.ietf.org, conex@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [conex] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-13
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex/>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:28:41 -0000

Thanks, all!

Jari

On 01 Dec 2014, at 17:29, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-13
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 1 Dec 2014
> IETF LC End Date: past
> IESG Telechat date: 4 Dec 2014
> 
> Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC
> 
> This revision addresses my question below.
> 
> RjS
> 
> On 8/5/14 2:58 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12
>> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
>> Review Date: 5-Aug-2014
>> IETF LC End Date: 8-Aug-2014
>> IESG Telechat date: Not on an upcoming telechat agenda
>> 
>> Summary: Ready for publication as Informational
>> 
>> This document handles a complex description problem in a very accessible way.
>> Thank you for the effort that has gone into creating it.
>> 
>> One minor point to double-check:
>> 
>> This document goes out of its way to push decisions about measuring in packets,
>> bytes, or other units to the concrete  encoding proposals. RFC6789 was explicit
>> about conex exposing a metric of congestion-volume measured in bytes.
>> 
>> RFC6789 was published a couple of years ago - has that part of it become stale?
>> If so, it would be good for this document to explicitly call that out.
>> 
>> If not, (most of section 4.6 goes back to -04 which predates RFC6789),
>> does this document need to retain the this flexibility in its description?
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email