[core] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-03 ietf last call Yangdoctors review
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 08 December 2025 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8559B97945F8; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 11:55:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=tzi.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfcXzgUIzM_Q; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 11:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77B3397945E8; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 11:55:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tzi.org; s=2019; t=1765223703; bh=GPop7b/JhqSjX7+iNuZqC8o3wkc31h+5KZq6KLzmAgo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Oi9zHp2TpReYfjpeyZwHnJcw/T1xsJsTrOuR3OcZ4wdc5W2RzGW1kIKXOXgE1SI1W TIQ4T8AHmEYxDivwdBf2S9az3fh8d0eXa9JnLjBkzf1f4QgCd5J6HDfO16QYwRNaI2 nGy+VB6TQSiR9wUcjyEez0nmJBtVDmdJUbytSVLr8wXVRZWmuXK2EoHmYHrkeCkpFW fID6vvV4hpm09laCcAvoVK4osAHupnwHXF/9fvVy+CyNoLGXQ+g4ni/yAsN/cb4Mi4 Kdwg6v0NY6d3eYRjGOJuX7I8M6QLhCMhNuRt/sGPL+SvbD2zaK+t15/iv4PRfVD74K 8cndHtGXtyVbg==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcea3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dQCPg1pMwzDCbh; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 20:55:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <176492945191.337151.15413588963065995096@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-wk4l4>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 20:54:52 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B0C3F634-226A-4378-B7B2-A6F486D4FB2B@tzi.org>
References: <176492945191.337151.15413588963065995096@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-wk4l4>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
X-FromAuthMilter: ok
Message-ID-Hash: 46C3JPAV4ZJP5K7ZEDYMHPKKXRNI4Q4U
X-Message-ID-Hash: 46C3JPAV4ZJP5K7ZEDYMHPKKXRNI4Q4U
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-core.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: yang-doctors@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [core] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-03 ietf last call Yangdoctors review
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/-xdK3I25k8m7EUzlLiTc4RNlMLo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:core-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:core-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:core-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Dhruv, On Dec 5, 2025, at 11:10, Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > - Section 4: It would be clearer to explicitly name the referenced registry as > “YANG-SID Mega-Ranges”. - Table 1: The entry points should be 3 000 000 000 and > 300 000 000 000. The table should list only the starting values; the range is > implied by the size column rather than by showing the full span. Thank you for noticing this; we were indeed not very consistent here, neither with the IANA template nor with our own terminology (Mike Bishop made a related comment in his AD review). Should be fixed in -04 [1] [2] now. Grüße, Carsten [1]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-04.html [2]: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-04
- [core] draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-03 ietf last … Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker
- [core] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-p… Carsten Bormann