IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-new-block: Find a better name for the options

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 29 October 2020 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE563A0B9F; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wY5sA9Kuf1Rg; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0BA33A0B92; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34E7389E3; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id S2zF1WDb16W1; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CD5389E1; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8853439; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:46:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
cc: "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <22718_1603960697_5F9A7F79_22718_215_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031568EFF@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <17641_1603436697_5F928099_17641_177_5_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315657B6@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <22718_1603960697_5F9A7F79_22718_215_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933031568EFF@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:46:10 -0400
Message-ID: <32754.1603971970@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/1KidLPe8IgWgH8T_pEqEJ4aUsZs>
Subject: Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-new-block: Find a better name for the options
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:46:15 -0000

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
    > Thanks for those of you who replied to the poll.

    > So far, we have 4 proposals with the same preference. We will proceed
    > with Q-Block (less changes to the figures :-)) in the next iteration,
    > but we are open to change if we got more inputs.

Tough-Block is better, I think.
If you like, "T-Block"

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email