[core] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 15 October 2019 22:04 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0681120045; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-core-hop-limit@ietf.org, Jaime Jimenez <jaime@iki.fi>, core-chairs@ietf.org, jaime@iki.fi, core@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.105.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <157117708870.28091.17993723408155206601.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:04:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/2Qb4ZQ52uhjDUEOyWKM9pZSUmTw>
Subject: [core] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:04:49 -0000
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-hop-limit/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for a simple, yet useful document. Just some really small nits here: I wish you had used “that” in most places in the document where “which” is. Perhaps the RFC Editor will change those. If you care to make me happier (an optional thing, surely), you might change every instance of “which” to “that” *except* the one in the Abstract (which is correct). — Section 3 — Nevertheless, the presence of such proxies will not prevent infinite loop detection if at least one CoAP proxy which support the Hop-Limit option is involved in the loop. “support” -> “supports” A CoAP proxy which understands the Hop-Limit option MAY be instructed, using a configuration parameter, to insert a Hop-Limit option when relaying a request which do not include the Hop-Limit option. “do not” -> “does not”
- [core] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-l… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [core] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-h… mohamed.boucadair