IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Content-Format size for yang-cbor

Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io> Tue, 16 March 2021 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D963A1076 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfL6rQy9AlVf for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87143A1070 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id g9so14172090ilc.3 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Jm7HSFsjp+NVSOZq5Tz9KKtIXTrKdBMd3cney6D4lDg=; b=qAc/rDPdGYmncknyQRU3r5FWz+RojUl8FQ0MbhfuMoGR/liPF+qKMibzx3/AdM6de6 Ag1fusuvSgr1fxRN0e6rLRsyeNtc4nWO3Rg1iIsxstR/0jZtwaIlrFENOofZ862XZ6gu 6Z8xZzlFPNjrMASbakRmBneuXjvGcEdVvDduNK7f/Z8CH+bhqSNyJd2FW6iI+x15qlQ/ 8C22A0xw+XfTdz04mGXusEX6W8L0JIn6LtcTOx7RIIfKVaQG6pVNsRh3ibaeRoiKAqyw HpeK6ehnPMGlvT9qJwmGnbLgvRAmCTWTTtqfnQkghrn+RrT2Gpaww03v/WAc/W25IO8O 2NUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Jm7HSFsjp+NVSOZq5Tz9KKtIXTrKdBMd3cney6D4lDg=; b=Ze5t1zkX12lD50qBMngtPlrcpZChngmS2q3UpUdXsA6w3224xiizOMwEtCGQnA2VbL NLT7g9Ak2kxjFMbHfC8gun6BfH6w4usUg11Tu5pj8rbg+vfE//TqpdmGhOTE7Ncchrw+ a1SrLOuay1Y8bv9ZiEkGxAo4piBz/xpSmyN7CU3cgETpRHzw176is+0spemCjfiXk39T LAht9jHbEa1xoUE6h5ujQnDREuHB+aJwcGh/HDjQPnvdmOXaGCDSIZFJDnk2daol0snu 8uiP6hqdBMX46vEygSzWCx5zsJBKiapo9GfgLemNTdaDuvQR6cUHTJSlmS77t5DRnY0t YW4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532sH/m5VheXQdfFXrQ/NboI/MwuoM+IaWiXD9mwGdE3glUuYgB5 eIoUYNZLJqgdqt5wpAjs8/5gi86AEhlmr+Fy3v8j3uWo84k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwB/Uy28hIO+asOoyZLnMJK0qW4iJqiKDTn4lHglnFPosveFPjnVAa6qdGQt2vqoSY7XFMSG3NlrV7f/UC5qJo=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c010:: with SMTP id q16mr5605571ild.250.1615931276466; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <299C6908-F83E-42D3-87B1-883C12075780@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <299C6908-F83E-42D3-87B1-883C12075780@tzi.org>
From: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 22:47:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CACQW0ErK5Qj0CCMzEJ3GppyAAYCVx+MAgZABXHPeJcwxmAY43g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" <core@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b7325905bdae5118"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/2qwaW28bQlC5irDgPBsiHPPTjqw>
Subject: Re: [core] Content-Format size for yang-cbor
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:48:00 -0000

Dear Carsten,

I agree with you on the proposed allocation - 260 should do well.

Cheers,
Alexander



On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:10 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> In the IANA review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor, the question was raised
> what allocation range should be used for the content-format number for
>
> application/yang-data+cbor;id=name
>
> I believe this content-type will be used mostly for less size-sensitive
> applications, as a name is used for YANG identifiers and not a YANG SID.
> So I think we are fine in the range:
>
>    256-9999    IETF Review or IESG Approval
>
> e.g., 260.
>
> Any disagreement (or support)?
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email