IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-bormann-core-cocoa

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 16 August 2016 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F96F126579; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zWXtXbKTqrTc; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20BB124281; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l203so84781777oib.1; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qHbSw7vSIujPWu+i0UmvvIsC7VxG6hc13msLgWZoFoA=; b=Gt8UBLJXTnIHZLhWi5FfMu57jTb2NrELqiORs0Dly1oiSxJUMnp/e2Qd7pjJ78Nw/n 38Y45k4DCauV9R51liu812toOm2rWTKIolRAgRocUXE20Urd3JLNqtXYncNo5JtzRp1r miag+jipxRP+8sVpJHj80m+a5AhhAIcL+LZ304sXpsGK2enhNREeFZILL4+WMU3kbRfC PrzsYuoVMfas0Wp10WX7kvthq0g6gWOPZ0JxhiC3nG1AlGMBS+HPmA5A6oJIwxT0+WGF PgnPWGivG/+c5i4Yaa+hA1xJhr28UYrSifr+Q83ic58NJs1m5VzROqFh3f/PhcEWdRmC qlIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qHbSw7vSIujPWu+i0UmvvIsC7VxG6hc13msLgWZoFoA=; b=hKuGYyhrzqtsEwe8Pqa+pfM9aBMHfWxAB/KJ1ppL5exlGQIHNsSscJRhx3QR6SgA9u K/GC1YU3hpI0w+H+vqR3sh5N2JkzF3lRbY6jcLTZ4tBzEB+quu6jidcTUNAkXteb2JCm eqZcq0aIQNpHsxrTF6US3iOQiTSlvbbLC8EGOy/Ra096OgSj4hTlOrKpPbAWrs6SShaH d8jOUQJjVG9GwuquV2fPNd4Tzpu2dz+SiUC+3BjUwp6TpiMIU1YXqsht67rdfHhU2qDw LFyzo108Qyt8AHuoSx3SexFSYBSQI4nWFHvcZswE3FgYguNUNx611yRTnuyUIq6nSxD/ OzDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouufBuGAL8IzKJPOToehU+YPLuUpO2W5SFDgVfWAyAGzE9V9E9dcQAOjWw0zAKTbL4UHS/jhSuukYzKTuQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.25.165 with SMTP id k34mr10308556otk.169.1471321032024; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.181.193 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.181.193 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5D053452@blreml501-mbx>
References: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5D053452@blreml501-mbx>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:17:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp2YPRNUTvnmru0z0OfziRk-cPmMegAUg3Lp6-As1v_WHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: core@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c09d0b476e7be053a289f46"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/4-JeL0cpuUvbm4KEIiXJURfKNbw>
Cc: draft-bormann-core-cocoa@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-bormann-core-cocoa
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:17:14 -0000

I support adoption of this work. The work is of significance in cases where
the RTT is uneven amongst the nodes in LLNs and arriving at an optimal RTO
will significantly save retransmission overhead. Will keep reviewing and
testing the draft in the future.

Thanks for this work.

>
>
> From: core [mailto:core-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jaime Jiménez
> Sent: 15 August 2016 PM 08:39
> To: core@ietf.org WG
> Cc: draft-bormann-core-cocoa@ietf.org
> Subject: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-bormann-core-cocoa
>
>
>
> Dear CoRE-WG,
>
> As we discussed at last IETF96, working group adoption has been requested
for draft-bormann-core-cocoa. At the IETF meeting the room consensus was
for adoption. Please reply to the list with your comments, including
although not limited to whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors
are especially encouraged to comment.
>
> Since there are several concurrent WGA calls, we will end the call
on August 26, 2016.
>
> Thanks,
> Jaime and Carsten
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email