Re: [core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: (with COMMENT)
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 03 June 2021 15:55 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B663A0645;
Thu, 3 Jun 2021 08:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id TLbbxg8tRBzG; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de
[IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB973A0603;
Thu, 3 Jun 2021 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[84.141.204.137])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fwr7x0q21z315N;
Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:55:09 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <162244492744.31415.2969596725789001184@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:55:08 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-senml-versions@ietf.org,
core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, jaime@iki.fi
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644428508.376442-b85dab0fc926d9929aac78e18897f450
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E1FB24D9-D300-4148-BBCA-BCFB77A6A6E2@tzi.org>
References: <162244492744.31415.2969596725789001184@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/4-Uq7MkM_xh5RGBADYwSHwsi0rs>
Subject: Re: [core]
=?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf?=
=?utf-8?q?-core-senml-versions-03=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list"
<core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>,
<mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>,
<mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 15:55:19 -0000
Hi Éric, On 2021-05-31, at 09:08, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: No Objection[…] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work put into this document. > > Please find below one non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be > appreciated), and some nits. > > Thanks to Jaime Jiménez for his shepherd's write-up (including the WG > consensus) even if I regret that no motivation is given about the intended RFC > status. Thank you Carsten for acknowledging Jaime's work. > > I hope that this helps to improve the document, > > Regards, > > -éric > > == COMMENTS == > > -- Section 2.2 -- > While the motivation for the update is explained, is there any reason why the > usual OLD TEXT / NEW TEXT is not used here? That is a convention that I have seen, but that I wouldn’t have classified as “usual”. NEW TEXT would essentially be a reference to this section, so I don’t think that convention would help a lot here. > == NITS == > > -- Section 2 -- > Even with the warning in section 1.1, it took me a while to 'see' the Sigma > sign (and the were not helping). The are the result of an xml2rfc bug (#641); I’ll do some manual intervention for the next version. Added a caption, but I can’t talk about the sigma character because a related xml2rfc issue seems to prevent me from mentioning that in the caption. Pioneers get shot full of arrows… Left an RFC editor note. > Suggest to 'show' it in section 1.1. > OTOH, congratulations for using the XMLv3 features for the SVG equivalent, > quite neat. > > The whole text of this section is quite convoluted as it is a plain bit mask. Well, that’s what one gets if there are 10 independent sources of suggested improvements… But with the improvements you triggered, I think the section is quite clear now. Changes in https://github.com/core-wg/senml-versions/commit/cb7907b Grüße, Carsten
- [core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-c… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ie… Carsten Bormann