From nobody Fri Feb 12 00:40:01 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC773A141B for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:39:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwOsOaIn1m6n for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from wforward2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wforward2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC4873A1418 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148749C0; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:39:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap3 ([10.202.2.53]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:39:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=KtKCV+ LAkOmpKimnOPev1u+N0yi9O9Cl99Iw+xQyQV0=; b=LHzfEIk7UkRvUkglFEp9yF mm8xx9nC8Qt8im9N7mvZL0J+yMaBG7mDbvP10tD0Mfps8XNjYEGE6G9kAL67QKe/ yXWl3QJsv+6hgy2pOyiV3+Dbnh7LyQUA+9HwwxsinwKMym2kBI/3IscfeVIgMXoN 4hIGhLixhbWD3UyS9aBjP7AV0107KlTJyfix1rlJhvqYkDkb6sJcOzVipwBlQQ/5 l4Red9SiWOZ7B1sm/NiimgqOPeYzCGTetmkXtPh0yrBJfeNo0PWqcGm3VEG185Fp NV7Is9ns/hOl6Zyl8XREbtWJoRxL77DOK6vx9EqfJGmIbl25uGUXGL2i/qqp9lDg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledriedtgdduvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpeflrghimhgv pgflihhmrohnvgiiuceojhgrihhmvgesihhkihdrfhhiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpe fggfejkeelgfeiteehfffftddtgeejffehfeevudetteelgfdvheegfeeltdegvdenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjrghimhgvse hikhhirdhfih X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B5CCB420067; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:39:51 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <422b8d83-ee97-4a6c-81ec-3cf004f2cd09@www.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:39:30 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaime_Jim=C3=A9nez?= To: core@ietf.org, "Carsten Bormann" Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: [core] Review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-01 X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:39:59 -0000 Dear authors, first of all I'd like to apologise for the delay when providing the revi= ew. While I did not find any mistakes, there are few additions to the docume= nt that *could* help clarify it for the benefit of the readers: - Mention somewhere in the text that the maximum amount of features is 5= 3 and that therefore the highest version number is 2**53-1 in decimal no= tation. Therefore readers should not expect the usual linear semantic ve= rsioning for each version (1,2,3,4...) but rather (10, 26, 42, 58...). - Give an example of the current bitmap -for example in a double or floa= t representation- providing all features that are currently supported fo= r bver=3D26. 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00011010 - The limitation to 53 versions in total as well as potential feature de= precation was already discussed in various IETFs and neither authors nor= the group see that as a limitation. I agree with that providing that ex= pert review is conservative when adding new features. Potentially we cou= ld also think about bundling some future features if they are related be= fore publication; but it is very hard to forecast that. Note that, ahead of the shepherd writeup, it would be good to document e= xisting implementations out there. Editorial: "Network Working Group" should be CoRE. independently selectable "features" Use of quotes for features seems unnecessary, as those literally are fea= tures. =20 =20 Ciao! --=20 Jaime Jim=C3=A9nez