[core] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 03 September 2019 19:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D8812008B; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-core-senml-etch@ietf.org, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, core-chairs@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org, core@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <156753857865.3431.14971111950489795941.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 12:22:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/7s_97-z0OAy9D1CaknQAYfs1kaU>
Subject: [core] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 19:22:59 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-senml-etch/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Firstly, thank you for writing this, and also thanks to Carlos Pignataro for the OpsDir review. I have a question and a few nits which might be worth addressing if you are making other edits: Question: 1: The text in Section 4 feels quite hand-wavy / terse, and I don't think gives sufficient guidance to actually use this. e.g: What takes precedence? Do I refer to a specific record (using fragment identification) and then apply the FETCH / PATCH to that? Or do I use fragment identification to refer to records what have been PATCHed? As might be clear from the above, I'm not a CoRE person, so I'll be happy to accept "Your question makes no sense, this will be blindingly obvious to anyone who's actually implementing this...." :-) Nits: 1: Target Record: A Record in a SenML Pack that is matching the s/is matching/matches/ 2: The names for a Fetch Pack are given using the SenML "name" and/or "base name" Fields. I *think* that in this case "fields" would be better than "Fields" - you seem to be using the term fields generically in this case.
- [core] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf… Warren Kumari via Datatracker
- Re: [core] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-… Ari Keränen
- Re: [core] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-… Warren Kumari