Re: [core] [netmod] 🔔 admin WG Last Call of CORECONF drafts: draft-ietf-core-sid-11

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

Some YANG admin for core-sid

import must have a reference clause

such reference must be Normative References for the I-D

no RFC Editor note to update the date (I know, they will fix that :-)

contact lacks e-mail of WG

IANA Considerations fails to register namespace

IANA Considerations does not specify a Group name; a well-chosen group name makes a registry easy to find.  Many if not most of the existing Group names are not well-chosen.  Please choose with care. e.g. is this for constrained devices or for all; is it specific to YANG and will there be other uses? ....

Tom Petch
________________________________________
From: netmod <[e-mail]> on behalf of Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>
Sent: 09 March 2020 13:04
To: core
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [netmod] 🔔 WG Last Call of CORECONF drafts: draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12, -sid-11, -comi-09, -yang-library-01

It took us a long time to get the four CORECONF drafts in sync,
but now we are ready for WGLC.

This starts a working group last call for
— draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12
— draft-ietf-core-sid-11
— draft-ietf-core-comi-09
— draft-ietf-core-yang-library-01

ending on

        24:00 UTC on Tuesday, March 31, 2020.

(This includes some extra time for the IETF week and for cross-WG
coordination.)

This WGLC is copied to the netmod WG mailing list; please do have a look
at these drafts as they are slated to become a part of the greater
YANG/NETCONF/RESTCONF family.  We intend the discussion to be on the
CoRE mailing list, but if you find a fundamental issue with YANG or
RESTCONF, feel free to discuss that on netmod instead.

Please start a new email thread for each major issue that will need
discussion and make sure the subject line includes the draft name and
some sort of name for the issue.  (Minor issues such as typos can also
be sent to the authors.)

If you read the draft and think it looks fine, please send a one line
email to the list or to the chairs letting us know that so we can get
a feel of how broad the review has been.

(To reviewers and authors:)  If you are aware of any patent claims that
might apply to systems that implement these drafts, please review BCP 78
and BCP 79 and make any appropriate IPR declaration before the last-call
ends. If you are not sure whether you need to make a declaration or not,
please talk to the chairs and we will help.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod