[core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 26 May 2021 15:33 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-core-senml-versions@ietf.org, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, jaime@iki.fi, jaime@iki.fi
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <162204318386.5937.225407037704905384@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 08:33:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/BL9vw0Irnb4g0KrfKAudl6cpcvY>
Subject: [core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-senml-versions/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given the very constrained space, I wonder if it's wise to reserve 0 and 2 for
no real purpose. IIUC these would still result in version numbers > 10 and
therefore not break anything, yes?

[core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-c… Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: [core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Carsten Bormann
Re: [core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Martin Duke