Re: [core] Slides suitable for a lightning talk?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 21 January 2019 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD256130F0F for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:15:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3PFduxuRPGT for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28856130DC0 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:15:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost2.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c8:406a:91ff:fe74:f2b7]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x0LJFLZO018958; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:15:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.116] (p54A6CC50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.204.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43k1Tj3q0Qz1Br6; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:15:21 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFD1m3FsXQsSGex+n845zATmArdd4bbcA0gCD74LnOQctHjAoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:15:20 +0100
Cc: core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 569790918.8729399-6b50bf6f0f1db25ffd7fda341cdd94f6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5947D377-7627-47C7-837B-B52F3C790D5E@tzi.org>
References: <CAFD1m3FsXQsSGex+n845zATmArdd4bbcA0gCD74LnOQctHjAoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Carter <john.carter@taitradio.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/CKwJhndoc_vFd1AFo_VSFhjpPHI>
Subject: Re: [core] Slides suitable for a lightning talk?
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:15:34 -0000

Hi John,

> It would be great to give a lightning talk introducing them to CORE and the current state of play.
> 
> Anybody have some slides I can shamelessly use, giving full credit to original author of course? Will be drastically cut down to fit a lightning talk format. 

The IETF IoT directorate has started collecting slides:

https://github.com/iot-dir/slides

Those under “cabo” contain some slides about CoRE, but also discuss the greater scheme of things (IoT in the IETF).  So if you leaf forward a bit, you may be able to find something useful.

> Listening to the talks here all I’m hearing is MQTT and I think CORE deserves a lot more awareness. 

Right…  
I never made “MQTT vs. CoAP” slides, because it is hard to compare horse carriages with fishing boats.
(Well, from a protocol design point of view…  But that is of course not something a user is directly interested in.)  
If you want to hack something now, you of course use whatever the previous hacker has used and left some software around for.  And for a five-sensor deployment, you may not care about architecture much (or about security, and security is hard and gets in the way of hacking).

> This Communication is Confidential. 

(I don’t think so…)

Grüße, Carsten