Re: [core] Do we need a CORE charter item for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?

[Salvatore Loreto <[e-mail]>]

I do think we should have in CORE a deliverable for CoAP support of 
Sleepy Nodes,

we have seen a lot of ideas and mail discussion about this topic one 
year ago,
and the 4 individual submissions (if I am not wrong there are also a 
couple of the expired drafts on the topic)
on the same subject listed by Akbar is a clear sign of interest and 
energy to work on it

cheers
/Sal

-- 
Salvatore Loreto, PhD
www.sloreto.com



On 8/1/13 6:02 PM, Rahman, Akbar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Carsten asked me to send this message out to the WG list as we did not 
> have a chance to discuss the Sleepy Node topic in this IETF due to a 
> lack of time on the agenda.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> We have several current I-Ds in CORE (and LWIG) that discusses the 
> topic of Sleepy Nodes.  Among those are:
>
> draft-dijk-core-sleepy-reqs-00 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dijk-core-sleepy-reqs/>
>
> draft-dijk-core-sleepy-solutions-01 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dijk-core-sleepy-solutions/>
>
> draft-hong-lwig-sleepynode-problem-statement-00 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hong-lwig-sleepynode-problem-statement/>
>
> draft-rahman-core-sleepy-03 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rahman-core-sleepy/>
>
> Hence the following question to the WG:
>
> ·Should we have a CORE deliverable for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?
>
> Please write back with your thoughts!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Akbar
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core