IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-sid-05 and draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-07

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 15 March 2019 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBB413124B; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 06:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GByINxqkxJTm; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 06:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C7813124A; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 06:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1066; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1552656277; x=1553865877; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=x/pfRlB7shU4Fo6lrLTfZVmHCxwNHeU8fbYRNyCoAfg=; b=ARZ1PxoE6SGDzDPqC0Kco59DqLSql7jqhYCvCyQcG9nJzMlw6vAr5/6t WyKxqs3mFQZk2ha3UZDyPlvBkAAp3F3uhaOO934zN2Jcz9lMdlCE7p3gT 4+/iZJVrHqXMrn3txojwpqFRCcWbDKi+jtEFunQpgJ62tdnFVEsfCZdA1 U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHAAC8potc/5tdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUgQBAQEBCwGCD4FrJwqZS5gxgXsLAQGBd4J1AoRQIjUIDQEBAwEBCQEDAm0ohUoBAQEEOksEAgEIEQQBAR8QMh0IAgQBEgiFEK0sijaBLwGLMheBQD+BEYMSimIDpEoJApMZIZNQiwWSdQIRFYEoIAE2gVZwFYMnghYXjh5BMY1fgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,482,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="532585225"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 Mar 2019 13:24:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2FDOZbb025558 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:24:35 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:24:35 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:24:35 -0500
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [core] draft-ietf-core-sid-05 and draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-07
Thread-Index: AQHU0if+rkpVL8iC4E+Vyl/vbXGKcaYMvJmQ
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:24:35 +0000
Message-ID: <92df97c1457947f09a2de92d740de925@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
References: <21467.1551662213@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <21467.1551662213@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.63.23.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.18, xch-aln-008.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/DOlMvoM202gK6nGGftGv0rXKIyE>
Subject: Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-sid-05 and draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-07
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:24:39 -0000

I think that it would be good if these drafts could somehow progress to completion.

I've previously posted comments on the SID draft, but never received any response.

In short, I think that it would be more pragmatic if SIDs are restricted to the non-negative range of the signed 64 bit integer type.  I.e. disallow values from (2^63 through 2^64 - 1).

Thanks,
Rob 


-----Original Message-----
From: core <core-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: 04 March 2019 01:17
To: cbor@ietf.org; core@ietf.org
Subject: [core] draft-ietf-core-sid-05 and draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-07


I wonder if these two drafts wouldn't be better off in CBOR WG?
  draft-ietf-core-sid-05
  YANG Schema Item iDentifier (SID)
  draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-07
  CBOR Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG

Well, anything that would allow the SID to progress enough for the registries to be created so that they can be used.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email