IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 15 January 2020 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BAE1200B4 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:45:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id my5Sd462CnAc for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:45:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D11120025 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:45:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199793897B; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:44:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88DE96; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:44:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io>, core <core@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJFkdRwRVSnq+svJ9Ar_SOnH=PZWAV0JbZivM69y7-_RQp7zXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <29380.1565102380@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50428065032ECC2AB3345F619AD70@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <7505.1565633977@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50424C618A704460E4A8F8D99AA90@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <18990.1577231446@localhost> <CAJFkdRyWOfCb4U09rEJ-ZMR3GUuk-rmQ+f3Fs164Mxs8qkeVuw@mail.gmail.com> <22612.1578626081@localhost> <CAJFkdRztFUxdGcdvtTgB=9c-e_BwDAgLTmVPJ+OB8-dgs1sGog@mail.gmail.com> <15754.1578789013@localhost> <CAJFkdRy_3pC37ZxzhTmzqRgWjwDvEFTuhu5Z8+_ktaJgoeOGfg@mail.gmail.com> <6950.1578939331@localhost> <CAJFkdRwRVSnq+svJ9Ar_SOnH=PZWAV0JbZivM69y7-_RQp7zXQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:44:59 -0500
Message-ID: <14652.1579103099@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/DOpznd08XsFJq90_NjrTPK7O898>
Subject: Re: [core] progressing ietf-core-yang-cbor and ietf-core-sid
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:45:08 -0000

Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io> wrote:
    > Thank you very much for the proposed text! I have applied the changes
    > that you proposed with slight modifications where I felt the need. You
    > can find the proposed version in attachment and the changes here [1].
    > We are using markdown to build the draft, therefore there is no XML

Markdown even better than XML :-)

    > Please notice that the change you proposed for sec 6.4.2. seemed out of
    > place there and I modified slightly sec 6.4.1 to address what I believe
    > was your concern. Please let me know if further changes are required.

okay.

But, what about:
    >     Ivaylo, In section 6.3.3, you have no allocation for
    > constrained-voucher.  You had given us 2500:2550 ---
    > constrained-voucher-request.  And 2400 -- 2440:2500 ---
    > constrained-voucher.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email