IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] đź”” CoRE Working Group Adoption call for draft-bormann-senml-more-units-03

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 02 September 2019 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D32C12011F for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivzArc2TKdjF for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D9812011C for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCCB9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46MNrZ3LtCzyfk; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:42:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190902063259.26pjkp7sboaeoygq@EMB-918HFH01>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 10:42:53 +0200
Cc: core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 589106572.31357-2ef732336bded9d478610c82077c1239
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB91396D-9284-4A45-8FE2-D8B494CD6B66@tzi.org>
References: <20190821082234.5ostmp5mwdzn6uk7@EMB-918HFH01> <20190821082555.whoele3gzsm4ymsg@EMB-918HFH01> <20190826073128.eprl65oz3gn37xya@EMB-918HFH01> <20190902063259.26pjkp7sboaeoygq@EMB-918HFH01>
To: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Enbi4hpiDAUNsPpLkXaz9Ja0vDw>
Subject: Re: [core] đź”” CoRE Working Group Adoption call for draft-bormann-senml-more-units-03
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:42:58 -0000

On Sep 2, 2019, at 08:33, Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> The authors should resubmit the latest version, if possible with Harri's
> additions. 

Right.  I already prepared a bormann-04 of the individual draft with those additions (and the IPSO particulates one, as well), and that is what I just submitted as ietf-00.

I believe the one thing we need to decide before going for WGLC on this short document is whether we say “Updates 8428” or not.  I now seem to think we should, as we are changing SenML to also allow (“MAY, but SHOULD NOT”) use of the secondary registry, and that sounds like an actual update to me.  (Abstract and Introduction need a sentence on this “Updates”, too.)

GrĂĽĂźe, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email