Re: [core] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 18 February 2020 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE348120026; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:45:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_FSE5_Q-mi0; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDEF1200C1; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [129.192.10.3] (helo=[10.149.0.124]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1j43C0-0007B3-LM; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:45:40 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <EB30825C-E6E9-4A06-82FD-EEDBFAB745AC@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:45:39 +0100
Cc: core-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6B5D8D6-B8B5-4957-B447-0EA315445230@kuehlewind.net>
References: <158202743151.14138.7139954130434566804.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EB30825C-E6E9-4A06-82FD-EEDBFAB745AC@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1582033544;fedd9973;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1j43C0-0007B3-LM
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/FkQ1sVczCCypKNsldABPvKAP9SU>
Subject: Re: [core] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?ietf-core-senml-more-units-04=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:45:48 -0000

Hi Carsten,

That’s fine. Thanks for confirming!

Mirja


> On 18. Feb 2020, at 14:44, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> The shepherd write-up says: "The document is intended for Standards Track and
>> updates RFC8428." However, this document doesn't seem to update RFC8422. I
>> assume this is correct and the write-up is a bit outdated? Just wanted to
>> double-check...
> 
> The proposed resolution of the most recent discussion was indeed that we don’t update RFC 8422 here, but leave that to version number/must-understand field specifications.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
>