[core] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 19 February 2020 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B961208A4; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:31:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units@ietf.org, Jaime Jimenez <jaime@iki.fi>, core-chairs@ietf.org, jaime@iki.fi, core@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.118.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <158208666560.19245.17358062449999549234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:31:05 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/GliOpkvzzhqIY07vs3qX9My18K0>
Subject: [core] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 04:31:06 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


I could not read the normative references to IEC-80000-6 and 13 as I do not
have access . I trust the sponsoring AD to have gone through them and verified
that the item number references are correct.

Also the following text in Section 3 seems very handwavy and not particularly
helpful. Is this necessary?

"    It is not presently known to this author how
      the upcoming revision of IEC 80000-6 will update this, but it has
      became clear that there is strong interest in using this unit
      specifically for the imaginary content of complex power, reactive
      power [IEEE-1459]"