Re: [core] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05

Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi> Fri, 27 September 2019 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jaime@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099CE12011E; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44W_E3EMLEJx; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA78612004F; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3D33C6; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:49:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=pwsi7B bvhMgeDBHvB5l5D0iq+fFYls20vvrpY3tZ5LI=; b=M0IeRgrUEi/gkV54VtitVr R7KWBGdIrWJa9eJ2O6yrfDXWtDuJ/SJPve0GbXY4s+meCqqw794KypBDwvx2F+E8 ZcI6FQOMnOh1DjgVU1X1KEiWRxKz7KtmuMUNxtLWCO7bZDZ/XwMi2fL9QL/Z8vOk YRtlhuiQFiwNndT7q0MrV2cXUhjlXWAAWt6s0aVkAvtnwcAlcHDyc1Ug1FhbGxLE mEzYTRSQ90Zt5pN6xZ3vykIaPVxuZWNC2XKvqqvrHFfFVeXeEDd0JNW1AiJCbK1g +P+J2M+O5PtVRd4STjH/nxSZHxzXu4csMyuXjWEYhj6HO2bvmVvjRoGADvaFB2rw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:XfeNXdb5IePvQ7oS5jsFHKRdVNuvQyWD_DS9DZcRmCgu1T0HJwvDRQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrfeeigdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtre dttdervdenucfhrhhomheplfgrihhmvgculfhimhornhgviicuoehjrghimhgvsehikhhi rdhfiheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepkeelrdduieeirdegle drvdegfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhgrihhmvgesihhkihdrfhhinecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:XveNXcAc7RhlQZr3Uzt-7Yjxc5Dd3wTZBH_ocDdBwGRsb65koTvKCw> <xmx:XveNXQLFkru8ULFrAesPiHXvm3evWv9xdRZRzFaSnpNRl0GqGcQ6-A> <xmx:XveNXTqTF3slb5MHZSmIJ_f3PiVnxF6J3Fnq_tVs9g1jC9ehBPYn1w> <xmx:XveNXWL4H6uxJ4VuwV3KQO7nMsaGYXhEQeDlqgbPlaMTyr1ApMnNZw>
Received: from EMB-918HFH01 (89-166-49-243.co.dnainternet.fi [89.166.49.243]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7DABF80061; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:49:46 +0300
From: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Cc: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190927114946.igkh7f3evmclwt4p@EMB-918HFH01>
References: <156954173082.31982.2465512704956520690@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313276CF@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <A63F6779-653D-4DC6-9A79-E3983A742714@sobco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A63F6779-653D-4DC6-9A79-E3983A742714@sobco.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/JvWn0PV7rGPniC72QsXgr5TFGms>
Subject: Re: [core] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:49:55 -0000

Hi,

I do not know of the rationale for not adding the CUNR information for
each option, I'd assume that the respective RFC is enough for that.
Maybe Carsten or others can shed some light to that.

Ciao!

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 06:59:34AM -0400, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Sep 27, 2019, at 4:30 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> (that
> >> the IANA registry does not include the option categories)  and would
> >> suggest
> >> that section 6.2 specifically refer back to section 5.10 of RFC 7252 and
> >> say
> >> that it is an extension of the table in the RFC.
> > 
> > [Med] No need to mention this is an "extension" of the table in 7252. The IANA registry is used to maintain the updated table.
> 
> not quite the case - the IANA maintains a list of options - the table includes additional information not maintained by the IANA
> (but maybe should be)
> 
> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core