IETF Logo Mail Archive

[core] Re: draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-03 ietf last call Artart review

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 08 December 2025 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACA29795B0F; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:01:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=tzi.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ct4h15J7nS41; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:01:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3D99795B01; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:01:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tzi.org; s=2019; t=1765224075; bh=oVxUmSqSa2i6EheCK70OP1b/SMSJHWIzfI7n39bIsJs=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=piMKUoq6kGLlRkAJa9N9bo+cQp74tygZ6cYmgrSlWSHsUXX0wBnuNQRiBZK0QeoiU rEPt4kF9vUG4ra4P2TUlbe1iXHUJQwRw/RqgV/YVn2leBqOnME5LbR6cl/xkotk0/Z NFWIBHDHLMKfavL5dlANM8M80Xhwr6LivpC/ULJnMThUrNbibgBNvZHLobrC0GxvwO DHYVEPVLQqosqo90qY3UaczAfM7Xd+guGeNeLo87NS6xf+LIHN7eqPGkc30Z/exUZ+ 2BOV1S4eMctwfZ+2Nftu9ZzoidbHzHqtKo2pkPxKMP2jjxYzaG8TSxpQgzawz0iF3d faamDMHEM7JiA==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcea3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dQCXq2HP4zDCbL; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 21:01:15 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <176517222640.896129.15934857949579738633@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-wk4l4>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 21:01:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A284B9B-7EB1-42D3-BA8E-9F5F173BF34B@tzi.org>
References: <176517222640.896129.15934857949579738633@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-wk4l4>
To: Joseph Yee <joseph.yee@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
X-FromAuthMilter: ok
Message-ID-Hash: 34TKT6HMNDBJC6H7VRAN6NYRBE6M2JPZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: 34TKT6HMNDBJC6H7VRAN6NYRBE6M2JPZ
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-core.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: art@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [core] Re: draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-03 ietf last call Artart review
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/KRoLx26rD_9husREuaAbx1b5DwQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:core-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:core-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:core-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Joseph,

> On Dec 8, 2025, at 06:37, Joseph Yee via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I reviewed the draft and considered it ready, assuming that CORE WG is okay
> with suggesting [I-D.ietf-core-yang-library] as one of the viable option to
> facilitate information discovery since [I-D.ietf-core-yang-library] is not an
> RFC and not an active draft.

Thank you for pointing this out.
draft-ietf-core-yang-library is still very much on our agenda, even if the document has been stable now for a while (and we haven’t played the I-D resubmit game very attentively).

draft-ietf-core-yang-library is most applicable for use of YANG SIDs in constrained devices [RFC7228]; the regular YANG library may be more applicable in implementations on more capable platforms.
Vendors usually also have a way to offer their YANG modules for download; we are expecting that they will make available SID files containing PEN holder SIDs via the same channels that they will use for offering SIDs that are allocated out of other ranges.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status