Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-observe-05 - "obs"

[Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>]

I'm weakly in favor of keeping 'obs' 

(but very supportive of the general idea of figuring out what we can get rid of - so thanks for raising this)


On Apr 17, 2012, at 1:19 AM, Thomas Fossati wrote:

> I'm waving the flag for poor 'obs' here.
> 
> It could provide a useful hint for a HTTP user agent that needs to take some decision about how to access the resource through a HTTP-CoAP proxy (e.g. use hanging GET instead of "usual" GET).
> 
> [ See section 4.3.4.1.1.1. of the HTTP-CoAP mapping I-D -- wow, six levels of indirection.  That's deep  nesting indeed :-) ]
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core