Re: [core] 🔔 WG Call for Adoption on draft-keranen-core-senml-fetch-02

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 22 October 2018 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A805130DC5 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sNdcvQRyVV3G for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8FC128CF2 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost2.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.200.7]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w9MKegb5001886 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:40:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.114] (p54A6CA9F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.202.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42f7hB0W1Dz1Bqf; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C6FD9EB8-65B1-4530-AF66-840431EB82D8@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:40:41 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 561933639.44203-8a25239e61b5a0c329a0c3afea72a7b6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1127349E-357D-44EF-B66F-C1F26E0C8093@tzi.org>
References: <C6FD9EB8-65B1-4530-AF66-840431EB82D8@tzi.org>
To: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/PEXt8DhXdwGqVo0IcofKeBu6DME>
Subject: Re: [core] =?utf-8?q?=F0=9F=94=94_WG_Call_for_Adoption_on_draft-kera?= =?utf-8?q?nen-core-senml-fetch-02?=
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:40:53 -0000

Although a bit late coming, we do have some more indications of support on the mailing list now.
(Chair hat off: I also submitted review comments privately to the authors.)

So we can declare WG adoption now: Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-core-senml-etch-00

Grüße, Carsten


> On Oct 11, 2018, at 20:50, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; wrote:
> 
> In Montreal, we said we were looking for interest on draft-keranen-core-senml-fetch on the mailing list and, if yes, call for WG adoption.
> 
> We now have a review (which, to me, doesn’t create any critical issues with the approach, but raises a few details we can work on in the WG process), so we do have some interest, and we can finally call for WG adoption.
> 
> So:
> Please reply to the list (or, exceptionally, core-chairs@ietf.org) if you have read the draft and have an opinion on whether we should work on it as a WG.
> Please reply before
> 
> 	2018-10-18 close of business.
> 
> (This should give the authors some time to resubmit as draft-ietf-core-senml-etch before the I-D deadline.)
> 
> Authors: 
> I think we accidentally started asking for known patent claims (“IPR”) in a previous WG adoption call, and I’m starting to like that.  So maybe just confirm that any “IPR disclosures” needed have been made (which should be the case already), or that you don’t personally know about “IPR” (patent claims) applying to that draft.
> Also please feel free to submit a -03 in the meantime to address Christian’s comments, as long as you don’t change the general direction of the draft.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>