[core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic

"Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF7C11E81BA for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:36:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.200, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4JnTtYlUqXTN for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out1.interdigital.com (smtp-out1.interdigital.com [64.208.228.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A5121E814B for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SAM.InterDigital.com ([10.30.2.11]) by smtp-out1.interdigital.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:36:34 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CEDC2B.57333473"
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:36:32 -0500
Message-ID: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C0561B74B@SAM.InterDigital.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
Thread-Index: Ac7cK1YqMzRJhdYORw+JQXBuUFLKkg==
From: "Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
To: "Core" <core@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2013 02:36:34.0493 (UTC) FILETIME=[57321ED0:01CEDC2B]
Subject: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:36:43 -0000

Hi All,

 

 

 

Once again we ran out of time on the agenda to discuss the WG interest
on the topic of Sleepy Nodes

 

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt

 

 

However, Carsten did suggest that we carry the discussion that we would
have had in the meeting forward to the WG list.  The key questions that
we need WG feedback on are:

 

1.       Does the WG want to keep discussing Sleepy Nodes in CORE?  The
Sleepy Node support could be in:

a.       CoAP Protocol

b.      CORE Link Format

c.       CORE Resource Directory

d.      Etc.

 

2.       Sub-Question:

a.       Does the WG want to see some immediate development of the
Mirror Server concept (which seems to have near unanimous support and is
well correlated to Sleepy Node support)?

 

 

Any and all comments are appreciated!  Please write back even if you
answered earlier Emails on this topic as we need to gauge WG interest.

 

 

Thanks,

 

 

Akbar