Re: [core] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 19 February 2020 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FE6120086; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:27:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=Ty1alwsy; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=HDw7NtVa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7cfvvon1NQBj; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A79120045; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C023721E92; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:27:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:27:46 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm2; bh=hhRPLq7N9pA5wP1d3eCPnDE dUKM1kqekb2aWVqj2nUE=; b=Ty1alwsyfe6Mx9DXaTpXpSrq0mWG5sBB4XC42og pZpxAudFS+jW1vyvuuLAXHr4dmKehM0LrLYXYMWdMaDYHdujqxEQybrcEi9NZwgg lnDFx5IzHKzoO6EGFDdEzVME+KcjqE++O1xKGDdks2Vh3N8tyHXDVVAdrf/nOfoh r3kNy6c1sdOYPYtjNnSvd2nspEVyUB7NLWeBWKgm5dCPeJM5E00raaMVO3URckdR uPWVrkhnsi6KYztK1qnX14B9oOzy9dY3wJUR1KHgqZ8b1VE24Awi4FaYF6w/GiEE OaU9ht2WnLsmLLqx7QU2JIMBF8gfM4BnNXz5tQMvhekClvg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hhRPLq 7N9pA5wP1d3eCPnDEdUKM1kqekb2aWVqj2nUE=; b=HDw7NtVaryArudFs6sKVOD HMuDLQLMLVAi39rhDsWO5eCU5wswlXkl+cNbZiLmN5VaxID2WbcFAIlXeqXD28cd R8YHTZohFGKywRzRbNc+3Ro3VeCJLEAOxPJfNMPkJoBzwIC/C2RgSUcVjkXKNupv zOi3G9ZR7pdm5J+qJlbgH17gnQmXBlAduADLPvCH89UEpuVvB+Nv406jfJDj2juq dmve7bUekLRxSt1rb+cdvuTtJwzs9p8PaeCCsNVJjJK4Of7oWp5a7Xk4gottVw0v 6EQDgzFX5TkHGUyrUcDr+rxrQ/5i+82aVMJDkszU5ff8ZDDXx5uzR+pzVJs+jgOQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:MoxNXlD62hdVCmrHRSCqww9RoKRXeCwILZWrou6_WozdSJJ5ncOb1Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrkedtgdduvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffktgggufffjgfvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekvdenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghooh hpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:MoxNXvOshnrIZru9hXBr_qxNpgOoSfvoaIXpEa-WUdAhNDzHOv9ESQ> <xmx:MoxNXtD2MoWjaUG9iOsrQgp8PSjnNokIqJMgwCOyStOwVJCvycZUJQ> <xmx:MoxNXo7OT8RWvlY9UA6uI1p9BLpfkQrdo8IMZ1kTC-4Af-zuHSvG8w> <xmx:MoxNXr6PCdLKmcF5KT5BuadlDXIBtesrAu18xfAWw14t8GLy7hZbgw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.82]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A5FC33280063; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:27:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <CD948DDD-B7FD-43DA-B2A8-11AD85F2F005@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4EAB7FE2-15F9-47F5-85FA-AE7B61F023DB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:27:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0C6A661E-CDA5-4E99-96E4-5DDC1A03B6A1@tzi.org>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units.all@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
References: <157254010642.30489.13409170000311799067@ietfa.amsl.com> <0C6A661E-CDA5-4E99-96E4-5DDC1A03B6A1@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/QWxs0L9AqFIcXYszdefjvne9fto>
Subject: Re: [core] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:27:50 -0000

Linda, thanks for your review. Carsten, thanks for your response. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to ask some questions about interoperability.

Best,
Alissa


> On Oct 31, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Linda,
> 
> thank you for this review.
> 
>> On Oct 31, 2019, at 17:41, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
>> Review result: Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-??
>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
>> Review Date: 2019-10-31
>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-30
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>> 
>> Summary:  The document is very light, describing IANA registration for acronyms
>> for various UNITs, such as "ms" for Millisecond, "min" for Minute, "kW" for
>> Kilowatt, etc. While there is no problem of those acronyms, I don't really
>> understand why it is necessary to have an RFC for this purpose. Many IETF areas
>> don’t even allow Gap Analysis drafts to be published as RFCs.
> 
> Registrations to an existing registry indeed do not require an RFC.
> 
> However, beyond registering a few values, this draft also
> 
> — creates a new registry and defines its expert review instructions,
> — updates Standards Track RFC 8428 to accept values from this registry in a place previously governed only by a different registry.
> 
> While there is still some ongoing debate about whether this was the right approach to address the requirements, if we uphold this approach we will require an RFC.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>