[core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-10: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 18 January 2021 16:26 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C753A098C; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:26:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-core-dev-urn@ietf.org, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>, marco.tiloca@ri.se, housley@vigilsec.com, dthaler@microsoft.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <161098718084.16632.293509938198284708@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:26:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Smwx48iPi0gjwUEOAeQjgIoKoKo>
Subject: [core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:26:21 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-dev-urn/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I just wonder why this document is the work of CORE as it is quite generic and could be used outside of CORE (but, this is not a problem at all as it is an IETF stream document and had an IETF last call). There have been two IoT directorate reviews by: - Dave Thaler https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-core-dev-urn-09-iotdir-telechat-thaler-2021-01-07/ - Russ Housley: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-core-dev-urn-09-iotdir-telechat-housley-2021-01-06/ both reviews have a status of 'Almost Ready' that translates into authors SHOULD really address the comments (and I have seen already many email messages on those reviews). Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated), and one nit. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 4.1 -- Should "FFFF" be replaced by "0xffff" especially as there is some text before (section 3.2.1) suggesting to use lowercase of MAC addresses ? More important: can MAC address be part of an identifier in the world of random MAC address (or on the spot generated MAC address -- think VM) ? I suggest to add some text around MAC address randomization impact. == NITS == -- Section 4.2 -- s/64 bit identifier/64-bit identifier/ ?
- [core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-c… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker